Abstract

Background: At a personalized level, identification of patients at higher risk of 30-day readmission and in need of special clinical attention could lower their chances of readmission. While at a system’s level, reducing hospital readmission improves the overall quality of care delivery and reduces the associated cost burden. Objective: To enhance understanding of the predictors of 30-day readmission after ischemic stroke and identify high-risk individuals. We aimed to compare the performance and the predictive power of machine learning-based methods and identify the best model. Method: The electronic health records (EHR) of acute ischemic stroke patients were extracted from two tertiary centers within the Geisinger Health System between January 1, 2015, and October 7, 2018. A total of 61 variables, including clinical variables, demographical characteristics, discharge status, and type of health insurance were used in this study. Patients were randomly split for model development (80%) and testing (20%). Random forest, gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine, and logistic regression, were developed to predict the 30-day readmission after stroke. The models were evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: A total of 3,184 patients with ischemic stroke (mean age: 71±13.90 years, men: 51.06%) were included in this study. From the 3,184, 301 (9.40%) were readmitted within 30-day. The best performance was obtained when XGBoost was used with ROSE-sampling. The AUC for the test set was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) with PPV of 0.43. The top four predictors of the 30-day readmission model were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score above 24, insert an indwelling urinary catheter, hypercoagulable state, and percutaneous gastrostomy. Conclusions: Machine learning model can be designed to predict 30-day readmission after stroke using structured data from EHR. Among the five algorithms analyzed, XGBoost had the best performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.