Abstract P3-04-01: The role of routine post-operative mammogram after breast conserving surgery

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The use of routine post-operative mammogram (RPM) in search of residual calcifications after breast conserving surgery (BCS) remains controversial due to a paucity of data and conflicting results. In our institution it is common practice is to send all patients who presented with malignant calcifications and underwent BCS with negative surgical margins for RPM before radiotherapy. Patients are also sent for post-operative mammogram if they had malignant calcifications and positive surgical margins, to look for residual calcifications and use localization to ensure their removal in the re-excision. Methods: We reviewed the records of 182 patients in our institution referred for RPM between January 7, 2018, and July 14, 2021. Continuous variables were described using medians and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with residual calcifications. Results: Median patient age was 59 (48-67) and 39 (21.4%) patients received neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Eighty-five (46.7%) patients had pure DCIS and 66 (36.3%) had mixed IDC with DCIS. On surgical pathology 14 (7.7%) patients had involved surgical margins and an additional 28 (15.3%) had margins less than 2 mm to pure DCIS. Tumor characteristics and RPM results are presented in table 1. Of the 19 (10.4%) patients with suspicious residual calcifications on RPM, 17 (89%) underwent biopsy of the calcifications and the other 2 (11%) patients were referred directly for re-excision. Seven (36.8%) of the patients with suspicious residual calcifications had DCIS. No patients had residual invasive disease. The pathology results of patients with residual calcifications on RPM are presented table 2. Of the 7 patients with residual DCIS, 4 underwent re-lumpectomy, 2 underwent completion mastectomy and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Additional DCIS was found in all the re-excisions. Two patients with residual DCIS had surgical margins under 2mm from pure DCIS while 5 patients (2.7% of all patients) had no indication for postoperative imaging or re-excision and the residual disease was identified solely based on the mammographic findings. Close or involved surgical margins were not significantly associated with residual calcifications on post-operative mammogram. Age under 50 was the only factor significantly associated with residual calcifications (OR 3.2 95% CI 1.1-9.7) and residual DCIS (OR=11 95% CI 1.13-109). Conclusion: In our cohort RPM revealed a small percentage of cases of residual DCIS that would have otherwise gone untreated. Larger studies are required to better identify factors associated with residual disease on RPM and to identify its impact on local recurrences. Table 1: Tumor characteristics and RPM results Table 2: Pathological results of patients with residual suspicious calcifications on RPM Citation Format: Opher Globus, Keren Grinin, Orit Keidar-Person, Einav Nili-Gal Yam, Keren Levanon, Naama Herman. The role of routine post-operative mammogram after breast conserving surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-04-01.