Abstract

Background: Recent reported population-based rates of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) are higher than in older studies, though the context of these diagnoses is not well-defined. To better understand these trends, we examined the accuracy of administrative codes ( ICD-10 ) for CVT in different clinical scenarios. Methods: Cases of CVT presenting to a tertiary center between 2008-2018 were identified in two ways: free text search through all hospital electronic radiology reports regardless of modality and body part and any ICD-10 discharge codes (see Table 1). Electronic medical records were reviewed to verify diagnoses of CVT and their clinical context (Figure 1) to calculated Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of ICD-10 codes. Additionally, sensitivities of ICD-10 codes were calculated against all CVTs identified using either searches that were verified on chart review as the gold standard. Results: There were 289 confirmed cases: 239 new diagnoses, 204 of which were acute events. Only 75 cases (37%) were new, symptomatic CVTs not provoked by trauma or structural processes. Sensitivity and PPV for ICD-10 codes depending on clinical context is reported in Table 1. Conclusion: The majority of CVT identified at our institution were incidentally diagnosed in context of intracranial processes such as trauma, surgery, infection, or masses; 37% were symptomatic, non-structural incident diagnoses. Our findings have implications in interpreting CVT rates identified through administrative data, as the management and prognosis of CVT may differ based on clinical context.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.