Abstract

Background: Recent data suggest that luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation may be inadequate to prevent esophageal thermal injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation. This is due in part to delayed responses to thermal latency and the continued temperature rise that occurs in tissues even after the cessation of RF energy with HPSD settings. Proactive esophageal cooling has been shown to reduce severe esophageal thermal injury during medium-power medium-duration RF ablation, but less is known about the effects in HPSD ablation. Objective: We aimed to quantify the time course of esophageal damage in scenarios with and without proactive esophageal cooling, hypothesizing a reduction in the resulting tissue damage with proactive esophageal cooling. Methods: Using a computer model of RF ablation in the left atrium adjacent to the esophagus, we calculated temperature over time using ablation power of 50 W for 10 s and 90 W for 4 s. We then determined the fraction of resulting damage to esophageal tissue via the Arrhenius equation and by the percentage of tissue above lethal isotherm temperature of 50°C. Transmurality of injury was then plotted over time, and results were compared between ablation with and without proactive esophageal cooling. Results: Esophageal damage increased even after the cessation of RF energy, suggesting significant thermal latency effects under HPSD ablation. Lesion growth continued for >10 s after cessation of 50 W ablation energy, and for >12 s after cessation of 90 W ablation energy without cooling. With proactive cooling, lesion growth after cessation of ablation energy was essentially halted. Without esophageal cooling, maximum injury transmurality reached 79% with 50 W, and 58% with 90 W. With esophageal cooling, injury transmurality remained below 20% with 50 W, and 10% with 90 W, representing reductions of 75% and 83%, respectively. Conclusions: RF ablation using HPSD settings demonstrates significant latency of effect, with tissue damage and lesion growth continuing beyond the cessation of application of RF energy. Proactive esophageal cooling significantly dampens this effect, reducing esophageal injury by up to 83%.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.