Abstract P2-04-04: Breast cancer risk reduction in high risk women identified at the time of screening mammography. Integrating data from an established high risk clinic

Abstract

Abstract Background: At the time of screening mammography, patient data can be collected and entered into a Modified Gail Model Risk Assessment Tool to identify patients at increased risk of invasive breast cancer. In turn, these patients can be referred to high risk centers where risk reduction strategies and chemoprophylaxis can be considered. The objective of this study is to establish how many women are at high risk of invasive breast cancer in a screening population who should be referred to a high risk center for counseling. Methods: This is an observational prospective study evaluating 1,000 women at a single institution presenting for mammographic screening or diagnostic evaluation. At the time of mammography, these women routinely complete a standard intake questionnaire addressing breast cancer risk factors put forward by the institutional clinic. Modified Gail model risk scores were calculated from these data sheets. Women with a 5 year risk of invasive breast cancer of 1.7% or greater were identified as well as women at particularly high risk (≥3.4% or double the 5-year risk). At the time of analysis patients with a history of breast cancer or who underwent diagnostic mammography were excluded. Retrospective data from our institutional high risk clinic from January 2007 to December 2009 was analyzed in respect to patient age at referral, Gail Model Score, personal history of breast cancer, history of benign breast biopsies, and recommendation for and acceptance of chemoprophylaxis. Results: Of 1,000 women screened in the prospective analysis, 366 had ≥1.7% 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer. 26% (96) of these women were under 60 years old while 74% (270) were ≥60 years old. Among the latter group, 19.6% (53) were found to have ≥ 3.4% of developing invasive cancer. In these women with double the 5-year risk, 96.2% had a family history of breast cancer and 69.8% had a prior biopsy. Similarly, in women under 60, greater than half were high risk secondary to a prior biopsy or family history. In the retrospective analysis of 600 patients evaluated in the high risk clinic, 38.8% were eligible for chemoprevention based on age >35, Gail model risk score, and no contraindications to treatment. 45.7% accepted recommendation for chemoprophylaxis as opposed 54.3% who had declined. Age was not found to be a predictor of acceptance of treatment. Conclusions: 1/3 of patients who receive annual screening are at high risk for breast cancer. These patients can be identified from data routinely obtained at the time of screening mammography. These women should be referred for high-risk counseling and consideration of chemoprevention at the time of screening mammography. Further prospective studies may be warranted to determine if this is an effective way to provide risk reduction strategies for high risk women. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-04-04.