Abstract P2-02-20: Enumeration of heterogeneous circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer patients based on size and deformability

Abstract

Abstract Background : The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood is an independent predictor of the efficacy of systemic therapy and a prognostic marker for patients with metastatic breast cancer. One of the leading techniques to detect CTCs uses immune-magnetic separation followed by immunocytochemistry. A microdevice can capture and enumerate CTCs using distinctive physiological difference (size and deformability) between cancer cells and blood cells. This microdevice thus obtains a larger CTC yield than that of affinity based separation which enriches the samples from a particular subgroup of cells based on biomarker (EpCAM) used. In this study, we investigated CTCs in peripheral blood from metastatic breast cancer patients using this microdevice. Patients and methods: We examined blood samples of 9 patients with heavily treated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Informed consent from these patients was obtained before blood extraction. Blood samples were taken into sodium EDTA tubes after discarding the first 1ml of blood samples. Two ml whole blood were subjected to the microdevice (Clear cell system), and CTCs were trapped in the microwells: Trapped cells were analyzed by immunocytochemistry with monoclonal antibodies specific for leukocytes (CD45) and epithelial cells (CK8/18), along with 4,2-diamidino-2-phenylndole dihydrochloride (DAPI) for nuclei. CK8/18- positive, DAPI-positive and CD45-negative cells were defined as CTCs. Three patients were examined using both this microdevice and affinity-based separation with EpCAM, to compare the yield of CTCs. Results: Of the 9 patients: 7 had ER-positive primary tumors, and 6 had PgR-positive ones, HER2 overexpression was detected in 2 primary tumors. CTCs were detected in 8 patients. The single patient in whom CTCs were not detected suffered from local recurrence (axillary lymph node metastasis) only, with no distant metastases. We were also unable to detect CTCs using EpCAM affinity method for this patient. The number of detected CTCs in the other patients ranged from 19/2ml to 156/2ml (mean 90/2ml), and the sizes of CTCs varied from 5 to 16μm. CK8/18-negative and DAPI positive were detected in most patients, and these cells tended to be larger than CK8/18-positive cells, suggesting that epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) might occur in CTCs. The total number of CTCs detected by the microdevice from 2 patients was larger than that of CTCs detected by EpCAM affinity method (107/2ml vs 1/7.5ml, and 19/2ml vs 39/7.5ml). Conclusion: CTCs detected by this microdevice varied in regard to the size of trapped cells and characteristics examined by immunochemistry, suggesting the heterogeneity of CTCs. Further research on this heterogeneity is vital in order to develop personalized treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Tozuka K, Nagai SE, Inoue K, Komatsu K, Matsumoto H, Hayashi Y, Kurozumi S, Suganuma M. Enumeration of heterogeneous circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer patients based on size and deformability. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-20.