Abstract

Abstract New approaches are needed to improve long term survival for patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Women with metastatic TNBC have a worse 3-year survival compared to women with metastatic HER2+ or ER/PR+ disease.1 Identifying the molecular vulnerabilities of TNBC subtypes could provide for optimal treatment strategies. Gene expression analyses of TNBC patient samples by Lehmann and Bauer, et al. identified 6 subtypes of TNBC.2 Based on the analysis of laser dissected tumor samples, the number of tumor subtypes was reduced from 6 to 4.3 Both analyses identified two types of basal-like cancers, basal-like 1 (BL1) and basal-like 2 (BL2).2,3 The BL1 subtype is defined by the amplified expression of genes involved in cell division and DNA damage response, and RNA polymerase.2 BL2 cancers express high levels of genes involved in growth factor signaling, glycolysis, and gluconeogenesis.2 They show that cell lines representative of the BL1 and BL2 subtypes of TNBC are more sensitive to cisplatin than cell lines representing the other TNBC subtypes. The BL1 or BL2 categorization, however, failed to predict sensitivity to olaparib.2 BL1 and BL2 representative cell lines responded differently when treated with veliparib; BL1 cells were more sensitive than BL2 cells.2 We investigated the response of BL1 and BL2 cells to a variety of DNA damaging agents to determine if the BL1 or BL2 subtype was predictive of sensitivity to a particular drug. DNA damaging agents, including alkylating agents, anti-metabolites, topoisomerase inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors were tested in cells resenting the BL1 and BL2 subtypes. HCC1806 cells (BL2) were found to be selectively sensitive to gemcitabine when compared to HCC1937 cells (BL1). The panel of drugs and cell lines was expanded to further understand the sensitivity of BL1 and BL2 subtypes to a variety of DNA damaging agents. Our goal is to provide preclinical evidence for the informed use of specific DNA damaging agents in the treatment of patients with BL1 or BL2 subtypes of TNBCs. 1. Li, X. et al. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 161, 279–287 (2017). 2. Lehmann, B. D. et al. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2750–2767 (2011). 3. Lehmann, B. D. et al. PLoS One 11, e0157368 (2016). Citation Format: Shaffer CV, Robles AJ, Risinger AL, Mooberry SL. Differential efficacies of DNA damaging agents in basal-like TNBC subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.