Abstract P2-03-25: Pilot study to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to PET/CT imaging using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT imaging as biomarkers in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Abstract

Abstract Background: 18F-FES is an FDA-approved estrogen analogue PET imaging tracer (Cerianna) which measures tumor estrogen receptor (ER) expression at multiple tumor sites simultaneously and predicts response to endocrine therapy. 18F-FDG is a commonly used glucose PET imaging tracer which measures glycolytic metabolic activity in tumors. Elevated plasma ctDNA has been associated with an increased risk of relapse and can identify actionable genomic alterations. This pilot research study explored the relationship between somatic copy-number variants (CNVs) and cell-free DNA mass using low-pass-whole-genome (LPWG) ctDNA in the blood to FES and FDG PET/CT findings with both qualitative and quantitative image analysis in metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: Two(2) 10ml Streck tubes were collected from 20 patients with metastatic ER+ breast cancer +/-30 days of their FDG-PET/CT scan (n=19) or their FES-PET/CT scan (n=9). 8 patients had both scans. Somatic mutations were assessed using comprehensive genomic profiling of tissue samples from 19 patients using the clinically validated UW-Oncoplex assay. Qualitative analysis included detection of LPWG ctDNA, presence of PIK3A mutations in tissue, and intensity of uptake in PET/CT imaging. LPWG ctDNA of blood samples evaluated ctDNA mass and CNVs that comprised at least 8% of total ctDNA. Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in FDG scans and total lesion estrogen receptors (TLER) in FES scans were calculated using a dedicated workflow in MiM software (MiM Software Inc. Cleveland OH). Quantitative analysis included the circulating fraction (ctDNA), PET/CT SUVmax of the index lesion, number of lesions, TLG and TLER. For TLG, the threshold for determining measurable lesions was calculated using liver SULmean + 1.5*SD. The threshold for TLER was calculated using SUVmean of the mediastinal blood pool. The ctDNA fraction and the number of lesions for both FDG and FES were each ranked into 3 categories. FDG and FES data (SUVmax of index lesion, # of lesions, and TLG or TLER) were correlated to the calculated ctDNA fraction values. TLG and TLER were also correlated to each other. Results: ctDNA was classified as no ctDNA present (n=9), ctDNA present (n=8) and indeterminate (n=3). Average neoplastic ctDNA fraction was 0.114 (range 0.03-0.423). PIKC3A mutations were: 10 absent and 9 present. Ranked categories for ctDNA fraction, FDG TLG and FES TLER are shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows results of FDG and FES analysis and correlation with ctDNA. Ranked ctDNA findings correlated with both the FDG number of lesions (R2=0.69) and TLG (R2=0.83), but not the SUVmax of the index lesion (R2=0.29). Correlation decreased for ctDNA versus FES number of lesions (R2=0.51), TLER (R2=0.61), and SUVmax of index lesion (R2=0.16). TLG and TLER significantly correlated with the 8 patients that had both an FDG and FES PET/CT scan (R2=0.77). Conclusions: In this pilot study, FDG TLG showed a significant correlation with ctDNA. There is an encouraging association with ctDNA fraction and number of FDG lesions and with ctDNA fraction and extent of FES avid disease (TLER) in the 9 patients that had FES. Research Support: RG1005258 Table 1. Categorical rankings for qualitative analysis of ctDNA, TLG and TLER Table 2. FDG and FES imaging results and correlation with ctDNA Citation Format: Natasha Hunter, Lanell M. Peterson, Mark Muzi, Eric Q. Konnick, Jonathan Reichel, Paul Kinahan, Jennifer M. Specht, Rachel Yung, William R. Gwin, Hannah Linden, Christina Tran. Pilot study to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to PET/CT imaging using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 18F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT imaging as biomarkers in patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-25.