Abstract P164: Using Mixed Methods to Assess Community Based Participatory Research Implementation: Assessment of a Walking-Based Health Intervention Program

Abstract

Introduction: The Border Coalition for Fitness (BCF) is a community-based organization sponsored by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso(TTUHSC El Paso) that facilitates walking-based programs. These interventions aim to increase physical activity among a majority Hispanic population in El Paso, TX. To provide programming that effectively meets the community's needs, the BCF aims to operate within a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework that centers on community engagement and the translation of research into tangible benefits to the community. This mixed methods assessment examines perceptions of the BCF and its impact on the community. Methods: For the quantitative study, depending on the self-selected group (BCF, community leader, or community participant), respondents completed either a leadership (BCF, community leaders) or non-leadership (community participants) questionnaire. Both assess perceptions on a scale from 0 to 10, 10 being the best, across three constructs: leadership(L), resources(R), and ability and commitment to organize(C). For the qualitative study, members of the BCF and former walking intervention participants completed one-on-one interviews consisting of 13 open-ended questions. Qualitative interviews are ongoing. Results: Preliminary results from the quantitative survey (n=103) show high ratings across stakeholder groups and constructs. BCF members consistently represent the highest ratings (L:9.6; R:9.6; C:9.3) across all constructs, followed by the community leaders (L:8.3; R:8.1; C:8.5), and finally, community participants (L:8.0; R:7.7; C:7.6). There is good agreement among BCF members (n=5) and community members (n=2) that the BCF has a strong collaborative relationship with its academic sponsor and the community and provides impactful programming. Areas cited for improvement included a need for more autonomy on the part of the BCF and improved understanding of and interaction with the BCF on the part of community members. Conclusion: In conclusion, early findings from this mixed-methods assessment indicate strong support for the BCF and its programming among leadership and the community. However, insight gained from the qualitative interviews highlights several areas of improvement in terms of community-based participatory research practices, particularly encouraging community engagement with the BCF beyond participation in the walking-based programs.