Abstract

Abstract Background: Risk assessment in node-negative (N0) breast cancer patients (pts) is routinely performed by established clinico-pathological algorithms (CP) (Schmidt et al. Ann Oncol 2009). ASCO guidelines also recommend invasion markers uPA/PAI-1 (UP; Harris et al. JCO 2007). The prospective randomized multicenter NNBC 3-Europe trial had two questions: 1) Does UP compared to the CP algorithm improve identification of low-risk node-negative breast cancer patients? 2) Does addition of taxanes to adjuvant chemotherapy improve DFS probability in high-risk node-negative breast cancer? Data are mature to report on the second question only. Methods: Between 2002 and 2009, 4,147 node-negative breast cancer pts were recruited. Risk assessment was performed by CP (43 %) or by UP (57 %). High-risk pts were randomized to receive FE100C*3-Doc*3 (FEC-D) versus FE100C*6 (FEC) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival probability (DFS). It was planned to accrue 2,572 pts allowing detection of 4% reduction in recurrence probability at 5 years with a power of 80 % at a level of α=0.05 (LogRank) after a minimum observation time of 2.5 years for every recruited patient. Results: In the intent-to-treat population (ITT, n=2,541), 1,286 high-risk pts received FEC-D, and 1,255 received FEC. In July 2012, 90.8 % of patients had reached the minimum observation time – median follow-up was 43.8, and 44.4 months. Main patients' characteristics were distributed similarly between the two chemotherapy arms: median age was 53 yrs, 37.4 % of pts were premenopausal, median tumor size was 1.90 cm, grade 3 was seen in 53.8 %, hormone receptor status was negative in 30.1 % and HER2 was overexpressed in 20.0 %. Mastectomy was performed in 11 %. All planned courses of FEC-D were given in 84.4 %, of FEC in 91.4 % (p < 0.0001). DFS after 2.5 yrs was for FEC-D 97.5 % (+/− 0.45 %) and for FEC 97.3 % (+/− 0.47 %). Overall-survival probability (OS) after 2.5 yrs was 99.0 % (+/− 0.29 %) for FEC-D and 99.5 % (+/− 0.20 %) for FEC. The survival differences between the two arms were not statistically significant. Per-protocol analysis did not reveal any additional results. Conclusions: Use of taxanes does not further reduce the rate of early recurrences and led to significantly more treatment discontinuation. Today, with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy even high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients have an excellent prognosis. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-13.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.