Abstract P1-13-05: The Effect of Treatment with Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients with breast cancer and bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, which may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL shown to be superior in delaying/preventing SREs and more effective in delaying moderate or severe pain in patients with advanced breast cancer compared with zoledronic acid (ZA). Previously reported results from this study population showed that both denosumab and ZA patients showed improvement or maintenance in HRQoL relative to baseline (BL), and a greater proportion of denosumab-treated patients had a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL. We now describe the effect of denosumab and ZA treatment on HRQoL among patients with varying degrees of pain at BL. Methods: Enrolled patients received subcutaneous (SC) denosumab 120 mg or intravenous (IV) ZA 4 mg every 4 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion. Pain was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory — Short Form (BPI). Patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on the level of pain reported at BL: no/mild pain or moderate/severe pain. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at BL, day 8, and before each monthly visit to assess overall HRQoL. Higher scores (range 0 to 108) represent better HRQoL. Improvement, maintenance, and worsening of HRQoL were assessed through month 18, when 30% of patients had dropped out due to death, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent. A change of ≥5 points (increase or decrease) in the FACT-G total score was considered a meaningful improvement. Results: Among patients who reported no/mild pain at baseline, more denosumab-treated patients had a ≥5-point increase in their FACT-G score from month 4 onwards. Over the 18 month period, an average of 4.1% more (range: −0.6% to 9.3%) denosumab-treated patients experienced meaningful improvement in HRQoL than ZA-treated patients. There were also fewer denosumab-treated patients experiencing ≥5-point decrease in HRQoL over 18 months (average of 2.4% fewer [range:-4.4% to 6.3% fewer]). Similar patterns were also noted for patients with moderate/severe pain at baseline. An average of 3.0% more (range:-1.7% to 7.9%) denosumab-treated patients had ≥5-point increase in FACT-G scores compared with ZA-treated patients over 18 months. A lower proportion of denosumab-treated patients (3.5% fewer [range: −1.1% to 11.5% fewer]) than ZA-treated patients had a decrease ≥5-points in their FACT-G score over 18 months. Conclusion: In patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, a greater proportion treated with denosumab than ZA had a meaningful improvement in HRQoL regardless of their pain level at BL. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-05.