Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare histologic type of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), characterized by the presence of cells displaying squamous and/or mesenchymal differentiation. The transcriptomic profiles of MBCs have been reported to vary according to the type of metaplastic elements. The somatic genetic alterations that underpin this breast cancer subtype remain to be fully characterized. Here we sought to define the genomic landscape of MBCs, whether different subtypes of MBC would be driven by distinct constellations of genetic alterations, and to investigate functionally the impact of mutations affecting WNT pathway genes using non-malignant breast epithelial cells. Methods: Thirty-five MBCs were retrieved from the pathology department of the authors' institutions and classified into the MBC histologic subtypes. All but one of the MBCs were of triple-negative phenotype. DNA was extracted from microdissected tumor-normal pairs and subjected to whole-exome sequencing. Somatic genetic alterations were identified using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms. The genomic profiles of MBCs were compared to those of 69 common type TNBCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Overall mutation rates were compared using the Mann Whitney U test, and the frequency of mutations in each gene was compared using Fisher's exact test. RNA was extracted from a subset of MBCs and subjected to WNT signaling pathway activation analysis with the RT2 Profiler PCR Array. Triple-negative non-malignant breast epithelial cells (MCF10A and MCF12A) and cancer cell lines were utilized for 2D and 3D functional studies. Results: Whole-exome analysis revealed that MBCs displayed a median of 103 (15-344) somatic mutations, which did not differ from the median number of somatic mutations in common type TNBCs (76, range 14-233). The most frequent recurrently mutated cancer genes included TP53 (69%) and PIK3CA (29%). MBCs more frequently harbored mutations in PI3K pathway genes than common type TNBCs (57% vs 22%, P<0.05), including mutations affecting PIK3CA (29% vs 7%), PIK3R1 (11% vs 0) and PTEN (11% vs 1%). MBCs also more frequently harbored mutations affecting WNT signaling pathway genes (46% vs 26%, P<0.05), including AXIN1 (6% vs 1%), WNT5A (6% vs 0) and APC (3% vs 0). MBC subtype analysis revealed that PIK3CA mutations were only detected in non-chondroid MBCs (53% vs 0), CHERP mutations were only found in chondroid MBCs (25% vs 0), whereas USP5 mutations only found in squamous MBCs (33% vs 0). MBCs with somatic mutations in WNT pathway genes had significantly higher WNT pathway activation than MBCs lacking mutations in these genes (P=0.0244). Consistent with the mesenchymal phenotype frequently exhibited by MBCs, in vitro experiments provided functional evidence that aberrant WNT pathway activation induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, with downregulation of epithelial markers and upregulation of EMT transcriptional inducers. Conclusions: MBCs are significantly enriched for mutations affecting PI3K and WNT pathways, highlighting the importance of the dysregulation of the WNT pathway in MBC carcinogenesis. Moreover, our findings suggest that specific mutations are significantly associated with distinct histologic subtypes of MBCs. Citation Format: Geyer FC, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Wen YH, Wen H-C, Pareja F, Eberle CA, Burke KA, Lim RS, Natrajan R, Mariani O, Brogi E, Norton L, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. The genomic landscape of breast metaplastic carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-03.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.