Abstract P1-02-02: A review of 66 consecutive patients investigated for mammographic abnormalities by digital tomosynthesis guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) has replaced surgical biopsy for the assessment of mammographic abnormalities that are not evident clinically and or on ultrasound examination. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for, and accuracy of, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) performed using digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) guidance. (Hologic® Dimensions, Affirm guidance and Eviva handsets). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Design: Retrospective medical record and histopathologic review. Patients and method: We introduced DBT guided VABB in June 2014 having previously investigated such patients using the prone table technique. This is a review of the first 66 consecutive patients investigated using this technique up to April 2105. The following information was reviewed: Indication for VABB, (mammographic classification M1-5, type of abnormality – calcifications/mass/distortion), complications of the procedure itself, (failure to complete, infection, haematoma), the result of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) review of imaging/pathologic correlation and the outcome for the patient. RESULTS: In one case it proved impossible to locate the lesion and this patient has been excluded from further analysis. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (30-80years). VABB was proposed for patients with lesions initially reported as highly suspicious (M5) 4 patients (6%), suspicious (M4) in 18 patients (28%), intermediate (M3) in 37 patients (57%) or benign (M2) in 6 patients (9%). Mean size of the lesion was 13mm (range 3-100mm). Forty-four patients (68%) presented with micro calcifications, 14 (21%) with distortions in and 7 (11%) with masses. There were no complications (infection or haematoma) that required further management following the procedure. Review by the MDT agreed that all biopsies were adequate and removed representative tissue from the lesion (No B1s). Review showed that the histology was benign and consistent in 30 (46%) patients all of whom were discharged to routine screening. 19 (29%) cases were reported as B3 (ADH, flat atypia, LCIS or ALH) in whom all the calcifications had been removed in 13 (20%) and the patients discharged and 6 (9%) went to open biopsy for residual calcifications all of whom were benign on final analysis. There was one (1.5%) radial scar reported as B4 that went to open excision and proved benign. 15 (23%) proved malignant (B5a, B5b) and went on to definitive treatment (with one patient entered into the LORIS low risk DCIS trial). The procedure is quicker, more accurate (related to the higher resolution and larger window of the receptor plate) and involves less radiation exposure (often involving only one DBT exposure) when compared to performing the same procedure on the Hologic Platinum prone table. CONCLUSION: DBT-guided VABB is an accurate, convenient and safe procedure. Citation Format: Munir A, Moalla A, Williams HR, Thomas D, Huws AM, Holt SD. A review of 66 consecutive patients investigated for mammographic abnormalities by digital tomosynthesis guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-02-02.