Abstract

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related death worldwide in women and triple negative breast cancer subtype is associated with a poor prognosis. TNBC patients are treated mostly with chemotherapy. In addition to the standard of care, the DNA crosslinking agent Carboplatin is often used in the treatment of both early and metastatic TNBC. A fraction of patients presents a good response, but the majority are resistant or develop resistance to chemotherapy. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in TNBC is a major clinical unmet need and the identification of novel treatments against chemoresistant TNBC is necessary. Method: We used conditional reprogramming to establish 5 patient-derived TNBC cell lines (CRCs) from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from chemotherapy resistant tumors. All cell lines were resistant to carboplatin, and we performed shRNA high throughput screens to identify genetic vulnerabilities that could resensitize these cells to Carboplatin. We identified ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) as a target in one of the cell lines screened. Validation of this target was performed by targeted shRNA ATR knockdown and pharmacologically with commercially available ATR inhibitors both in vitro and in vivo. Results: We confirmed that ATR inhibition resensitizes TNBC CRC to Carboplatin with shRNA ATR. We used Ceralasertib and Elimusertib, 2 ATR inhibitors, to pharmacologically validate this hit. We tested the effect of the combination of each ATR inhibitors with carboplatin (IC25) using alamar blue assays and calculated the combination index with the Chou Talalay method in all 5 cell lines. We found the combination with Elimusertib to have a more potent synergy (Average CI=0.43) than the combination with Ceralasertib (Average CI=0.68). To further explore the mechanism of ATR inhibition in this combination we measured the key targets and observed a loss of ATR protein by western blot when the cells were exposed to the combination with Elimusertib-Carboplatin but not with Ceralasertib-Carboplatin. Pharmacological inhibition of ATR main effector Chk1 with Rabusertib or by knockdown did not recapitulate the synergy observed with Elimusertib-Carboplatin, suggesting the synergy observed is independent of Chk1 activity. Surprisingly, ATR inhibition or knockdown still modulated major cell cycle players. Finally, we performed in vivo validation using the PDX from which the cell line had been derived. Our results demonstrated that addition of low doses of Elimusertib to Carboplatin significantly delayed tumor growth compared to carboplatin treatment alone and prolonged survival in animal models. Conclusion: We highlighted the efficacy of ATR inhibition to resensitize drug resistant TNBC to Carboplatin as supported by our in vitro and in vivo results. Our data also sheds light on a potentially novel mechanism of action of the Elimusertib drug involving ATR loss of expression. Our findings imply that all ATR inhibitors are not equal, and they might be associated with different mechanisms of action. Citation Format: Juliet Guay. Combining ATR inhibitors with carboplatin in chemoresistant TNBC conditionally reprogrammed cells and patient-derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P072.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call