Abstract

Introduction Subarachnoid hemorrhage patients presenting with complex morphology, and those with dissecting /fusiform aneurysms, blister aneurysms have historically posed a challenge for acute endovascular treatment. Flow diversion as a treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is a last resort given the need for dual antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting. Methods We present our single center experience, real world experience in the acute treatment of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with pipeline flow diversion device. Results 6 patients presented acutely with a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Two of those had saccular intracranial aneurysms, 1 with a blister aneurysm, and 3 with dissecting aneurysms. 1 patient presented with a ruptured anterior choroidal artery location dissecting aneurysm, 1 with PCA blister aneurysm, 1 with intradural vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm, 1 saccular posterior communicating artery aneurysm, and another with a ruptured complex morphology anterior choroidal artery aneurysm, and 1 with dissecting PCA aneurysm. All patients were emergently loaded with dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of either aspirin and clopidogrel, or aspirin and ticagrelor or pletal and ticagrelor. 1 patient was treated with surface modified pipeline device with shield technology. Technical success was achieved in 100% of these patients. No acute in stent thrombosis was seen in this cohort. Four patients had no residual filling or recurrence at the 1st follow‐up at a median interval of 2–12 months. 1 patient died from fulminant vaso spasm. Follow‐up is pending in 1 patient. Conclusions In carefully selected patients, flow diversion in the acute setting is tolerated and can be an alternative treatment strategy with an acceptable safety profile.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call