Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility and safety of renal access, and surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent kidney stones who underwent repeat percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and compared those in PCNL-naïve patients. Between April 2012 and December 2016, 158 kidneys in 150 patients (73 male, median age: 55 years) were percutaneously accessed for PCNL. Of these, 24 kidneys (11.3%) in 21 patients were accessed for repeat PCNL for recurrent kidney stones (Repeat group). The rest of the 134 kidneys in 129 patients were PCNL-naïve (Naïve group). A stone-bearing calyx was generally accessed at the urologist’s request. Among the repeat group, 18 kidneys (75.0%) were accessed through a previously accessed calices. Technical success rates of renal access (overall and through a stone-bearing calyx), fluoroscopy time (minutes), and incidence of complications related to renal access which resulted in cancellation of same-day PCNL were compared between groups. Stone clearance (no residual stones > 5 mm on post-PCNL imaging) and incidence of complications related to PCNL were also compared. The overall technical success rate of renal access between groups were not significantly different (95.8% (23/24) vs (97.7% (131/134), P = 0.29). However, renal access through a stone-bearing calyx was significantly less achieved in the repeat group than the naïve group (82.6% (19/23) vs 94.9% (112/118), P = 0.05). No statistical difference in mean fluoroscopy time (10.4 vs 10.6, P = .49) and incidence of access-related complications (9.5% vs 5.4%, P = .52) were seen between groups. The complications included infection (2/24 vs 6/134, P = 0.35), bleeding (3/134, P = 0.61) and others (n = 2 in the PCNL naïve group). No statistical difference in stone clearance rate (63% vs 60%, P = .78) and incidence of PCNL-related complications (19.0% vs 24.8%, P = .72) were seen between groups. Renal access for repeat PCNL was feasible without significant difference in incidence of complications or fluoroscopy time compared to that for first-time PCNL. Access through a previously accessed stone-bearing calyx was also feasible, but carried a higher technical failure rate than that of PCNL naïve.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call