Abstract

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB–TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for patients with BCLC intermediate stage large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent DEB–TACE or TARE for BCLC intermediate stage large HCC (> 5 cm) was conducted at a single academic medical center from January 2016 to December 2018. Mann–Whitney test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). During a median follow-up period of 11.2 months (range, 1.3-56.7 months), 17 and 27 patients were treated with DEB–TACE and TARE, respectively. Both groups had similar background variables. Objective tumor response rate was higher for TARE (81.5%) than for DEB–TACE (41.2%; P < 0.05). The median TTP of DEB–TACE and TARE was 9 months and 10.5 months (P = 0.96), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 71.4%, 35.7%, and 35.7% for DEB–TACE and 80.7%, 60.5%, and 60.5% for TARE (P = 0.4). There were more patients succeeded to obtain downstaging within Milan criteria for TARE (25.9%) than for DEB–TACE (17.7%; P = 0.72). With regression analysis, the tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < 0.01) and TTP (P < 0.05). Compared to DEB–TACE, TARE has better tumor response rate for intermediate stage large HCC. However, there is no significant difference in tumor downstaging rate, TTP and OS between these techniques.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call