Abstract: Matching into Plastic Surgery: The Value of Research Fellowships

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although a growing number of plastic surgery applicants are interested in research fellowships, no resources exist to guide their decision making. Therefore, this study was performed to serve as a reference for individuals seeking a residency in plastic surgery. METHODS: Surveys were sent to integrated plastic surgery residency applicants from the past two years as well as program directors regarding prevalence, productivity and utility of research fellowships. A comparative analysis was then performed. RESULTS: 129 individuals participated in the study representing a 31% response rate. Approximately 27% of applicants participated in a research fellowship with 44% performing both basic science and clinical projects. Most applicants (55%) underwent a research fellowship to strengthen their applications. An average of 8 publications and 5 presentations were obtained during the research fellowship. Approximately 95% of research fellows matched into plastic surgery however, only 18% of applicants matched at the institution at which the fellowship was performed. Most research fellows believe that research is very important when applying for plastic surgery and would recommend a fellowship to interested medical students. Program directors rated research experience as the 3rd most important factor behind letters of recommendation and academic performance. Approximately 1–4 publications and 1–2 presentations were viewed as a productive fellowship. Quality of publications was more important than quantity. CONCLUSION: Research fellowships are a great way to strengthen one’s involvement in plastic surgery. Applicants with strong research backgrounds are highly sought after and significantly increase their chances of landing a coveted plastic surgery residency position.