Abstract

Abstract Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) is associated with elevated neoantigen expression across tumors, linked with an improved response to PD-(L)1 inhibitors. Here we report data from the final analysis of a Phase 1 trial that enrolled patients (pts) with various solid tumors treated with tislelizumab (NCT02407990). We evaluated the association of TMB with clinical outcomes, integrative biomarker analysis of genomic alterations and gene expression profiling by TMB status. Methods:451 pts were enrolled and treated with different doses of tislelizumab. Baseline tumor tissue was evaluated for gene expression (HTG EdgeSeq Precision Immuno-Oncology Panel) and genomic profiling (FoundationOne CDx). TMB-H and gene hyperamplification (HA) were defined as ≥ 10 mutations/Mb and a minimum of copy number gain > 5, respectively. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The overall objective response rate was 13.3% (95% CI: 10.3, 16.8), median (m) PFS 2.1 months (95% CI: 2.1, 2.7), and mOS 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5, 11.6). Improved clinical outcomes were observed in pts with TMB-H tumors (n=43, 16.2% of TMB evaluable pts), and response was further enriched in pts without gene HA (TMB-H/HA-) (Table). This population showed elevated cytotoxic T-cell activity and interferon signaling in the TME, along with fewer hyper-amplified genes in RTK-RAS-PI3K pathway. This was validated in an independent PD-(L)1 inhibitor treated pan-cancer cohort (n=837): TMB-H/HA-(n=139) had longer OS than TMB-H/HA+ (n=89) (mOS: 34 vs 15 months, P=0.07). Conclusions: The combination of TMB and HA was found to be predictive of clinical benefit across various solid tumor types, treated with tislelizumab. This joint algorithm, as reported by one clinically approved assay, may provide new insights to the identification of pts who are most likely to gain benefit from PD-(L)1 blockade. Clinical outcomes in pts subgroups by TMB and HA status TMB-H TMB-L Overall HA- HA+ Overall HA- HA+ n (% in TMB BEP [N=266]) 43 (16.2) 20 (7.5) 23 (8.6) 223 (83.8) 103 (38.7) 120 (45.1) ORR, % (95% CI) 32.6 (19.1, 48.5) 50.0 (27.2, 72.8) 17.4 (5.0, 38.8) 10.3 (6.7, 15.1) 11.7 (6.2, 19.5) 9.2 (4.7, 15.8) mPFS, months (95% CI) 8.3 (2.0,11.5) 15.1 (8.1, NR) (2.0, 1.2, 8.3) 2.1 (2.0, 2.1) 2.1 (2.1, 4.0) 2.0 (2.0, 2.1) mOS, months (95% CI) 20.1 (10.3, 37.4) 30.9 (11.1, NR) 9.7 (2.8, 23.8) 11.1 (7.7, 11.9) 13.9 (11.1, 18.2) 6.7 (5.6, 8.1) BEP, biomarker evaluable population; CI, confidence interval; HA, hyperamplification; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; TMB-H, high tumor mutational burden; TMB-L, low tumor mutational burden Citation Format: Sanjeev Deva, Michael Millward, Michael Friedlander, Hui K. Gan, Lisa G. Hovarth, Jong-Seok Lee, Andrew Hill, Shahneen Sandhu, Liang Liang, Jingwen Shi, Yun Zhang, Yang Shi, Xiaopeng Ma, Xikun Wu, Zhirong Shen, Jayesh Desai. The combination of hyper-amplification and tumor mutational burden as a pan-cancer biomarker in patients treated with tislelizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB511.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.