Abstract

Abstract The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS) is the main non-lysosomial proteolytic machinery in the eukaryotic cells. Prior to their degradation proteins are adressed to the catalytic 26S proteasome complex composed of a 20S “core” that contains proteolytic activities, assembled with one or two 19S regulatory particles that bind proteins to be degraded. Due to its central role of in regulating cell cycle progression and signal transduction the UPS has been proposed as a suitable target for antineoplastic strategies. To date only catalytic inhibitors of proteasome, targeting proteolytic activities of the 20S core particle, have been characterized and/or have emerged as potent anticancer drugs (1). However, the capacity of the UPS to degrade proteins not only depends of the catalytic activities of the 20S core, but also of the 26S proteasome assembly, a dynamic and tightly controlled cellular process. Thus, compounds impairing 26S proteasome assembly could represent a novel class of proteasome inhibitors. With the aim of identifying such molecules we first set up a robust biochemical screening assay allowing us to follow 26S proteasome assembly in vitro. First, 26S proteasome was purified from Hela cells using affinity chromatography followed by gel filtration. Then, experimental conditions were determined for in vitro 26S disassembly into its constitutive sub-complexes (19S+20S) ands its re-assembly as an active and functional 26S entity. The differential CTL-activity between 26S and 20S proteasomes (2) was then used as the readout to follow the reassembly of 26S in vitro, prior to be confirmed using in gel overlay experiments and western-blotting. Using this biochemical assay: 1) we screened naturals compounds endowed with antiproliferative properties and described as inhibitors of the ubiquitine-proteasome pathway (3). 2) we identified structurally-related natural molecules, epidithiodioxopiperazine and diketodithiopiperazine derivatives, as the first class of molecules inhibiting proteasome assembly without significantly affecting neither 26S nor 20S catalytic activity in vitro. Our research efforts now concentrate in showing that: 1) these molecules inhibit proteasome assembly in cells, and that 2) this inhibition can be correlated with their antiproliferative effects. References Sterz J. et al. Extert Opin. Invest. Drugs, 2008, 17 Rivett AJ et al., Experimental Gerontology, 2002, 37 Vandenberghe I. et al., Biochem. Pharmacol., 2008, 76 Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-295.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call