Abstract

In the paper under review, we investigate a class of abstract degenerate fractional differential inclusions with Caputo derivatives. We consider subordinated fractional resolvent families generated by multivalued linear operators, which do have removable singularities at the origin. Semi-linear degenerate fractional Cauchy problems are also considered in this context.

Highlights

  • AND PRELIMINARIESThe main purpose of this paper is to consider a class of abstract degenerate fractional differential inclusions with multivalued linear operators satisfying the following condition (QP): There exist finite numbers 0 < β ≤ 1, 0 < d ≤ 1, M > 0 and 0 < η < η ≤ 1 such that Ψd,πη /2 := λ ∈ C : |λ| ≤ d or λ ∈ Σπη /2 ⊆ ρ(A)and R(λ : A) ≤ M 1 + |λ| −β, λ ∈ Ψd,πη /2. we continue our previous research study [19], where we have recently considered fractional resolvent families subordinated to infinitely differentible semigroups generated by the multivalued linear operators satisfying the following condition

  • It is almost straightforward to extend the results from [19] concerning subordinated degenerate fractional resolvent families and semilinear fractional Cauchy inclusion (DFP)f,s,η : Dηt u(t) ∈ Au(t) + f (t, u(t)), t ∈ (0, T ], u(0) = u0, where 0 < T < ∞, 0 < η < η and Dηt denotes the Caputo fractional derivative operator of order η ([2]); cf

  • The situation is slightly different with the assertion of [33, Theorem 5.3], where the authors have considered the existence of mild solutions of semilinear degenerate fractional Cauchy inclusion (DFP)f,s,η, provided that the resolvent of A is compact

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The main purpose of this paper is to consider a class of abstract degenerate fractional differential inclusions with multivalued linear operators satisfying the following condition (QP): There exist finite numbers 0 < β ≤ 1, 0 < d ≤ 1, M > 0 and 0 < η < η ≤ 1 such that Ψd,πη /2 := λ ∈ C : |λ| ≤ d or λ ∈ Σπη /2 ⊆ ρ(A). The main contributions of paper are contained, where we transfer the assertions of [11, Theorem 3.1, Theorem 3.3, Theorem 3.5; Proposition 3.4] from semigroup case to fractional relaxation case (we have faced ourselves with some serious difficulties concerning the fractional analogue of the assertion [11, Proposition 3.2], when we are no longer in a position to conclude that the operator Tη ,r+θ(z) defined below is a bounded linear section of the operator (−A)θTη ,r(z)) Having this done, it is almost straightforward to extend the results from [19] concerning subordinated degenerate fractional resolvent families and semilinear fractional Cauchy inclusion (DFP)f,s,η : Dηt u(t) ∈ Au(t) + f (t, u(t)), t ∈ (0, T ], u(0) = u0, where 0 < T < ∞, 0 < η < η and Dηt denotes the Caputo fractional derivative operator of order η ([2]); cf Section 4 for more details.

MULTIVALUED LINEAR OPERATORS
SUBORDINATED FRACTIONAL RESOLVENT FAMILIES
SUBORDINATION PRINCIPLES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call