Abstract
Modern satisfiability solvers implement an algorithm, called Conflict Driven Clause Learning, which combines search for a model with analysis of conflicts. We show that this algorithm can be generalised to solve the lattice-theoretic problem of determining if an additive transformer on a Boolean lattice is always bottom. Our generalised procedure combines overapproximations of greatest fixed points with underapproximation of least fixed points to obtain more precise results than computing fixed points in isolation. We generalise implication graphs used in satisfiability solvers to derive underapproximate transformers from overapproximate ones. Our generalisation provides a new method for static analysers that operate over non-distributive lattices to reason about properties that require disjunction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
