Abstract
Abstract Background: A recent report from the AACR has found that black men (BM) men have prostate cancer (CaP) death rates that are more than 2 times those for men of any other race or ethnicity. Yet, BM are less likely to receive cutting-edge, or even standard of care treatment compared to their white counterparts. Limited access to care, transportation, patient perception and medical mistrust, as well as cost of care are major contributing factors. Meeting patients where they are and offering treatment in or closer to their homes should help reduce psychological distress and increase access to care and treatment compliance. As part of the iCCaRE for Black men Consortium, we propose a PCHC model which leverages Mayo Clinic Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program and provides a package of care to support the administration of cancer therapy and/or supportive care/symptom management to CaP patients in their homes by specialist healthcare professionals. The objectives of our pilot study are to understand patients’ choice of therapy in choosing the place of treatment and to evaluate the feasibility and impact of PCHC on clinical outcomes, as well as patient reported-outcomes (PRO) and health related quality of life (HQOL). Methodology: For Aim 1, structured questionnaires are used to assess patient preference for location of therapy, at the infusion center or in the home, as well as perceived difficulties and advantages; follow up qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews to capture patients’ thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and questions towards cancer treatments being administered at home versus in a hospital setting. Aim 2 is an observational study of BM with advanced CaP who are participating in a pragmatic, practice-based randomized clinical trial to track acceptability by and impact of home administration of cancer directed or supportive therapy. Results: For Aim 1, data is used to identify themes regarding perceived advantages and concerns of PCHC and inform our understanding of the proportion of patients who are willing to receive and would benefit from this level of care at home. For Aim 2, the following outcomes are evaluated: (a) time to first ER visit and to first hospitalization; (b) HRQoL and quality-adjusted survival; (c) patient satisfaction and compliance, including home time, adherence with symptom self-reporting and compliance with treatment, level of comfort interacting with the care team by phone or tablet, ability to reach a team member for questions or concerns; (d) cost, including out of pocket cost for patients. Conclusion: Our project will provide data on patient understanding and acceptability of cancer care at home and strategies for overcoming cancer care delivery disparities and barriers of access to care for underserved communities. The expected outcome of our project is that PCHC intervention will positively impact CaP treatment, patients’ access and experience with healthcare by developing a new concept of closer-to home cancer care delivery that will reach more patients in underserved communities. Citation Format: Roxana Dronca, Rohit Rao, Michael Maniaci, Folakemi Odedina, Ernest Kaninjing, Kimlin Ashing, Solomon Rotimi, Manisha Salinas, Sha’Reff Rashad, Arnold Merriweather, John McCall, Ebenezer Erefah, Ayinde Yahaya. Feasibility of patient-centered home care (PCHC) to reduce disparities in Black men (BM) with advanced prostate cancer (CaP): An iCCaRE Consortium for prostate cancer in Black men project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B046.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.