Abstract
Abstract Guideline-recommended ultrasounds for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance target patients with cirrhosis and certain liver conditions, yet uptake remains low, particularly among racial/ethnic minority groups. Underuse may be attributed to factors at the patient, provider, healthcare system, and neighborhood levels. However, in-depth analyses identifying contributory factors are lacking. We investigated the presence of racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of recommended surveillance among high-risk patients as a retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente Hawai‘i (KPHI) and Sutter Health in California, both of which serve numerous Asian American, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian (NH), other Pacific Islander (PI), and multiracial/ethnic patients. We included patients with ≥1 in-person encounter (2000-2017), no history of liver cancer, and a clinical indication of surveillance eligibility (cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B or C, or a high FIB-4 score ≥2.67) with a minimum EHR follow-up of 18 months post-eligibility. Recommended surveillance is biannual abdominal imaging (ultrasound, CT, MRI) or alpha-1 fetoprotein tests. We categorized eligible patients as 'ever surveilled' if conducted at least once during follow-up and by the proportion of follow-up time they were up-to-date with surveillance (PTUDS). The cohort includes 54,597 patients (9,488 from KPHI; 45,109 from Sutter); current results are for the KPHI subset only. Among N=9,488 patients (median age: 52; 46% female; 26% NHW, 14% NH, 11% Filipino, 10% multiracial/ethnic) median follow-up was 91 months and 82% were surveilled at least once, with a mean PTUDS of 14% (SD=19%) overall and 19% (SD=21%) among the surveilled. We used sex- and age-adjusted log-risk regression for risk ratio (RR) of ‘ever surveilled’ vs. not and linear regression for PTUDS; NHW is the reference group in all models. We found that NH (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.93-1.00), PI (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.97-0.95) and multiracial/ethnic (RR=0.95, 95%CI 0.91-0.99) patients were significantly less likely to be ever surveilled, and that PI (beta=-0.02, 95% CI -0.04-0.01) race/ethnicity was significantly associated with lower PTUDS, while Chinese (beta=0.04, 95% CI 0.02-0.06), Korean (beta=0.04, 95%CI 0.01-0.07), Vietnamese (beta=0.05, 95%CI 0.02-0.09), and other Asian (beta=0.03, 95%CI 0.00-0.07) ethnicities were significantly associated with higher PTUDS. Although not statistically significant, surveillance rates were lower for American Indian/Alaska Native and Black groups, and higher for Japanese and Non-Hispanic Other race/ethnicity groups. Continued analyses will incorporate Sutter data, employ fully adjusted models with clustering by health system, and examine patient, provider, and neighborhood drivers of these disparities. Our findings indicate racial/ethnic disparities in HCC surveillance receipt, particularly noting the heterogeneity within Asian populations, and underscore the importance of analyzing disaggregated data for Asian American groups to fully understand and address these disparities. Citation Format: Enyao Y. Zhang, Mindy DeRouen, Alison J. Canchola, Aly M. Cortella, Pushkar Inamdar, Janet N. Chu, Sixiang Nie, Mai Vu, Ma Somsouk, Michele M. Tana, Anna D. Rubinsky, Iona Cheng, Mi-Ok Kim, Mark Segal, Chanda Ho, Yihe G. Daida, Su-Ying Liang, Hashem B. El-Serag, Scarlett L. Gomez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Caroline A. Thompson. Racial and ethnic differences in receipt of guideline-recommended hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a high Risk, diverse primary care patient population: A study in two large integrated healthcare systems in California and Hawai‘i [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A161.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.