Abstract

Abstract Introduction: For the past three summers (2021-2023), a National Cancer Institute-funded R25 research education program has been underway at the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, entitled “Cancer Research—Scholarship and Training Experiences in Population Sciences” (C-STEPS). The program engages a diverse population of undergraduate students from across the nation in hands-on, mentored 10-week summer research education and training in cancer control and population science (CCPS). Methods: Using a data-driven methodology, the C-STEPS team has collected quantitative and qualitative data via REDCap surveys to evaluate program aims and student progress and ascertain how students experience the program to improve it for future cohorts. Students who decline admission are provided a one-time survey about the reasons they declined and asked to prioritize factors in their selection of summer research programs. Students enrolled in the program complete a pre- and post-program survey, pre- and post-seminar surveys, and a bi-annual alumni survey. The pre- and post-seminar surveys reflect expected competencies for each of the eight seminars that are part of the curriculum. The alumni survey captures academic accomplishments and career updates since completion of the summer program. Results: We have collected three years of pre/post-program data and pre/post-seminar data. Student knowledge, confidence, and interest in CCPS has steadily increased within each cohort across each of the three time periods: pre-program, immediately post-program, and alumni (1-3 years after the initial research experience). The pre/post seminar surveys indicated that the structure of the seminars inhibited interactions between the presenter and students and warranted change. We have administered the decliner and alumni survey twice each. Data from the decliner survey suggest that students apply to multiple programs each summer and the timeframe for notification to students about their acceptance may need to be shortened to give students more time to consider their C-STEPS offer in relation to other summer opportunities. Data from the alumni survey indicate that students continue to engage in research with their C-STEPS mentor and present the research at their home institution. Conclusion: Efforts to decrease the length of time between when a student applies and when they are notified of their acceptance are at the forefront of the refinement process for the next cohort. The seminars have been restructured to promote more student-led discussions and interactions between presenters and students. The CCPS research experiences and professional networks students develop during the summer have led to new educational and career opportunities. Initial evidence indicates that the success of C-STEPS extends well beyond the immediate one-time immersive research experience. Citation Format: Shoshana Adler Jaffe, Paige A. Lynch, Judith Sheche, Joseph Rodman, Miria Kano, Shiraz I. Mishra. Summertime fun: Findings from three cohorts of C-STEPS summer research trainees [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A111.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call