Abstract

Abstract Hormonotherapy with Tamoxifen (Tam) is one of the main strategies used world-wide for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. However, partial responses, tumor recurrence and acquired resistance to Tam may involve mechanisms unrelated to Estrogen Receptors (ER). Studies on non-ER related mechanisms of action of Tam led us to find that it induced breast cancer cell differentiation and death through the modulation of sterol metabolism and the stimulation of sterol oxidation (de Medina et al, Cell Death Differ, 2009), and that Tam inhibited cholesterol epoxide hydrolase (ChEH). ChEH catalyzes the trans hydration of cholesterol-5,6-epoxides (CE) and this activity is a property of the microsomal antiestrogen binding site (AEBS) (de Medina et al, PNAS, 2010). In the present study we report that Tam and AEBS ligands stimulated the oxidation of cholesterol into CE and induced the accumulation of CE in MCF-7 cells through the inhibition of ChEH at therapeutic concentrations. Since CE has been reported to be a modulator of Liver-X-Receptors (LXR), we investigated the impact of Tam and other AEBS ligands on LXR-dependent gene expression: Tam and AEBS ligands modulated the expression LXR-dependent genes in MCF-7 cells. This effect had a 24 to 48 hour lag time while the effect of direct LXR modulators was observable after 6 hours, suggesting an indirect action of AEBS ligands. The involvement of CE in the control of transcription by Tam and AEBS ligands was supported by the observation that vitamin E, which inhibited the formation and the accumulation of CE, totally blocked this transcriptional modulation. We found that knocking down LXR-α using interfering RNAs in MCF-7 cells blocked the transcriptional modulation of LXR-controlled genes induced by CE, Tam and AEBS ligands. Finally, we found that the knock down of LXR-α reproduced the vitamin E inhibition of the induction of differentiation and death of MCF-7 cells. Altogether, these data showed that LXR-α is implicated in the anticancer action of Tam and identified a new signaling pathway that could explain sensitivity and resistance to Tam. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 956. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-956

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call