Abstract 78: A Single Center Comparison Of Transradial And Transfemoral Approaches For Carotid Angioplasty And Stent Placement

Abstract

Context: Transradial access has been increasingly utilized for neurointerventional procedures including carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) over the past decade. At our center, we adopted transradial approach as the preferred approach in 2020. Objective: To compare the results of transradial approach with transfemoral approach for CAS as part of a quality assurance initiative. Methods: We analyzed data collected for all non-urgent CAS procedures performed at our institute in the last 24 months by same interventionalists to minimize inter-operator variability. We looked at the rates of technical failure; hemorrhagic complications classified as major (hemoglobin decrease >5 g/dL or intracranial hemorrhage with deficits), minor (hemoglobin decreases 3-5 g/dL or intracranial hemorrhage without residual deficits), or insignificant; and any stroke and/or death within 1-month post procedure. Results: A total of 182 non-urgent CAS procedures were performed at our institution; 116 (64%) were initiated using transfemoral approach and 66 (36%) were initiated using transradial approach. The median age was similar between the two group (66.5 years versus 66.7 years). There were 6 (3%) CAS procedures initiated using transradial approach but later converted to transfemoral due to anatomical and/or technical difficulties. One (0.6%) CAS procedure initiated using transfemoral approach was converted to transradial approach due to severe iliofemoral atherosclerosis. The rates of any stroke and/or death were 1.6% (n=1) and 3.3%% (n-=4) in patients undergoing CAS using transradial and transfemoral approaches, respectively. The rate of major hemorrhagic complications were 1.6% (n=1) and 5.7% (n-=7) in patients undergoing CAS using transradial and transfemoral approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The rates of major hemorrhagic complications were lower among patients who underwent CAS via transradial approach compared with CAS using transfemoral approach although the rates of technical failure remain relatively high with transradial approach.