Abstract
Abstract Mayo Clinic has developed 111 GBM PDXs from newly diagnosed (72 PDX) and recurrent (39 PDX) patients. This large collection of PDXs provides a broad representation of genetic heterogeneity seen in patients. GBM PDXs that perform well in both in vitro and in vivo settings can be extensively utilized in the preclinical setting for downstream analysis. Based on 20 years of experience, we have defined the attributes that best enable preclinical use of our GBM PDX models. Among them are short-term in vitro culturing performance, large scale genomic evaluation data, benchmarked responses to standards of care, and median time to moribund for untreated orthotopic tumors. PDXs with prolonged survival timelines delay study readouts and, in some situations, confound efficacy results due to age-related animal decline. Setting median survival thresholds as part of the upfront experimental design allows for more timely study readouts that are unaffected by these confounding variables. Our preferred cutoff for the Mayo GBM PDX collection is 70 days median survival (n=64). Using this 64 PDX line panel, regimens expected to double survival would produce results within 4-5 months. This timeframe is well within the range of robust health for athymic nude mice. This 64-line collection features both newly diagnosed (nGBM; n=42) and recurrent (rGBM; n=22) tumors. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined by qMS-PCR (25 methylated, 37 unmethylated, 2 indeterminate). Available WES (n=62) and RNAseq (n=42) data, along with our tissue microarray (n=42), are critical resources for biomarker-based evaluations aimed at defining patient populations that are most likely to benefit from a given therapeutic. From these data, the molecular subtypes available include 26 classical, 14 proneural, and 3 mesenchymal. Twenty-seven of these 64 PDX models have also been successfully cultured from fresh as well as cryopreserved cell stocks to further expand their experimental value. Correlative clinical data including diagnosis and treatments are also available (n=61). Current standards of care for GBM include radiation, temozolomide, and bevacizumab. Defining sensitivity to these therapies is an important first step for evaluating the integration of novel therapeutics with these standards. Since the creation of our GBM PDX collection, efficacy of these therapies has been evaluated as follows: RT 26 PDXs, TMZ 20 PDXs, and Avastin 23 PDXs. The Mayo Clinic GBM PDX collection provides an important platform for preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutics. Through careful selection of PDX lines with favorable growth characteristics and known genetic features, researchers can select the most relevant models for their study. This approach will enable more meaningful preclinical work in the hopes of providing more tangible clinical benefits for GBM patients. Citation Format: Danielle M. Burgenske, Ann C. Mladek, Katrina K. Bakken, Zeng Hu, Brett L. Carlson, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Jann N. Sarkaria. Defining critical features for successful preclinical use of glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDX) models for therapeutic assessment and clinical trial development [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6897.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.