Abstract 656: PD-L1 expression in primary lesions vs metastatic sites and by demographics in advanced urothelial carcinoma samples

Abstract

Abstract Background: Determination of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression levels in tumors may help physicians understand which patients (pts) are most likely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Understanding the impact of different sample types and demographics on PD-L1 expression is important to determine suitability of tumor biopsies for testing. Methods: As of July 24, 2016, 363 pts screened in the UC cohort of Study CD-ON-MEDI4736-1108 (NCT01693562) had tissue available for analysis and 47 pts had provided paired primary and metastatic samples. FFPE samples were tested in a central laboratory with the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay using a BenchMark ULTRA instrument. Pts were classified as having either PD-L1 high (PD-L1 expression ≥25% either on tumour cells [TC] or immune cells [IC]) or PD-L1 low/negative (<25% on TC and IC) tumors. PD-L1 high prevalence was reported in primary vs metastatic sites, and by age, sex and race. Results: PD-L1 status was evaluable for 332/363 (91.5%) pts (175/332 [52.7%] PD-L1 high and 157/332 [47.3%] PD-L1 low/negative) whose UC specimens were tested (intent to diagnose [ITD] population). Overall percentage agreement between paired primary and metastatic samples, based on combined TC/IC scoring ≥25%, was 74.5% (95% CI 59.7 - 86.1%). In the ITD population, using only the samples from which patient PD-L1 expression status was determined, PD-L1 high prevalence in primary and metastatic samples was 57.1% and 50.9% respectively (p=0.343, not significant). The proportion of pts with PD-L1 high status was not enriched in any demographic group (Table). Conclusions: Initial data from UC pts in Study 1108 showed similar PD-L1 high prevalence in primary and metastatic lesions and good concordance between paired primary and metastatic samples. These results build optimism that samples obtained from either location could be used to determine PD-L1 status. Further data are needed to confirm these findings. Patients screened for UC cohort with evaluable PD-L1 result - ITD population (n = 332)ParameterPD-L1 high, n (%)P valueAge, years<65 (n=131)73 (55.7%)0.438≥65 (n=201)102 (50.8%)SexMale (n=236)127 (53.8%)0.610Female (n=96)48 (50.0%)RaceAsian (n=52)23 (44.2%)Asian vs White: 0.406Black or African American (n=10)6 (60.0%)White (n=218)113 (51.8%)Other (n=9)4 (44.4%) Citation Format: M Zajac, A M. Boothman, Y Ben, A Gupta, X Jin, J Antal, A Sharpe, M Scott, M Rebelatto, J Walker. PD-L1 expression in primary lesions vs metastatic sites and by demographics in advanced urothelial carcinoma samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 656. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-656