Abstract 61: The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Stroke Subtypes: A Subgroup Analysis From the RESIST Trial

Abstract

Introduction: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a simple and non-invasive procedure that has proved safe and feasible in numerous smaller clinical trials. Still, mixed results have been found in recent large randomized controlled trials. Here we present a predefined subgroup analysis of the RESIST trial on the effect of RIC in subgroups of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and whether this effect is modified by adherence to RIC. Methods: The subgroups were defined as large artery atherosclerotic disease (LAA), small vessel disease (SVD), cardioembolic, and unknown/other/multiple/rare, and were based on ICD-10 discharge diagnoses assigned by the treating physician to define stroke etiology. Acceptable treatment adherence was defined as at least 80% received out of planned cycles. The outcome analysis used the entire range (‘shift analysis’) of the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (ordinal logistic regression). ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03481777. Results: A total of 902 patients were included in the target population group, 466 in the sham group, and 436 in the RIC group. RIC did not significantly improve functional outcome in adherent patients with LAA, cardioembolic or multiple/unknown etiologies. In SVD patients (n=94), with good treatment adherence, RIC treatment was associated with a significantly improved 90-day functional outcome, unadjusted OR (95% CI): 2.47 (1.01-6.02), p= 0.047. In patients with SVD, 4 patients (8%) in the RIC group compared to 0 patients in the sham group had atrial fibrillation (AF), p=0.050. The association remained significant after adjusting for AF, adjusted OR (95% CI): 2.64 (1.07-6.54), p= 0.035. Conclusions: In patients with AIS due to SVD, who had good treatment adherence, RIC treatment was associated with improved functional outcome at 90 days. These results are encouraging but should only be hypothesis-generating for future studies.