Abstract

Abstract We have set up a precision medicine strategy for solid tumors to i) understand biological heterogeneity and driver signaling pathways in cancer, ii) identify new drug opportunities, iii) develop biomarkers for drug responses, and iv) eventually tailor effective treatments for individual patients. Fresh cancer tissue is obtained directly from clinics and processed to provide patient -derived cells (PDCs). PDCs and original tumor tissues are characterized using genetic profiling and image-based phenotyping, phenomics. Systematic drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) is carried out on the representative PDC models. The PDCs are plated in 384-well plates and treated with oncological compounds, each in five concentrations in 384-well plates. The cell viability and toxicity are measured as drug responses using plate readers. Alternatively, drug-treated cells are immunostained and subjected to automated high-content imaging and image analysis. Central to the success of this approach is to grow and test the patient derived cells in ex vivo conditions mimicking the tumor microenvironment. To this aim, we have developed 3D drug profiling for PDC spheroids from ovarian and renal cancers. For the 3D drug profiling, cells were cultivated either in Matrigel or in cellulose-based hydrogel, GrowDex, which has earlier been shown to support 3D growth of cell lines and stem cells. The pipetting robot Biomek FXp (Beckman Coulter) was utilized for transfer of matrices and cells to 384-well plates, and acoustic dispenser Echo 550 (Labcyte) for delivery of tailored drug library of 52 drugs to the spheroids. The drug sensitivities of cancer cell spheroids were scored using cell viability measurement as well as high-content confocal imaging. Our results with primary cells and cell lines suggest that both Matrigel and cellulose-based hydrogel are applicable in the 384-well plate drug profiling assay, and PDC spheroids are formed in both conditions. When the drug responses of ovarian cancer PDCs grown in different 2D and 3D conditions were systematically compared, we observed significant differences in sensitivity to several drugs. Here, we describe the individual drug effects in all conditions, such as some chemotherapeutics being less effective in 3D. As a conclusion, the comparison of results from 2D and 3D drug profiling increases our understanding of mechanisms of drugs, and may aid to select the most representative drugs for the patient. Citation Format: Piia Mikkonen, Laura Turunen, Lauri Paasonen, Swapnil Potdar, Lassi Paavolainen, Astrid Murumägi, Olli Kallioniemi, Vilja M. Pietiäinen. Precision cancer medicine based on 3D drug profiling of patient-derived cancer cell spheroid models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5029.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.