Abstract
Background: Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is emerging as a novel cardiovascular biomarker of HDL function. To facilitate large-scale human studies, we analyzed analytical performance of CEC and compared a high-throughput fluorometric method with the standard isotopic method. Methods: CEC was assessed in J774 cells with either 3 H-cholesterol (isotopic) or BODIPY-cholesterol (fluorometric) to 2.8% apo B-depleted plasma over 4h. Three cohorts were studied: 22 healthy men and women, 38 patients with premature coronary heart disease (CHD) and 196 subjects selected from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS), a population-based study of Dallas county residents. All samples were stored greater than 1 year prior to measurement. Results: In healthy subjects (A-B), CEC by both methods did not show diurnal or weekly variation or changes with prandial status, or one freeze/thaw cycle. However, storage at -20 o C resulted in lower CEC compared to storage at -80 o C (p=0.02). CEC by both methods was similarly decreased in patients with CHD compared to healthy controls (p=0.06). In 212 DHS subjects, CEC for the two methods were correlated with each other (r=0.54, p<0.0001) but had differential correlations with HDL-C and HDL-P (figure). Conclusions: CEC to apo B-depleted human plasma is not influenced by timing of sampling or storage conditions, with the exception of storage at -20 o C. A 96-well high-throughput fluorometric method using BODIPY-cholesterol exhibited similar performance characteristics as the standard isotopic method with differing correlations with HDL composition and may therefore be advantageous in large scale human studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.