Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is superior to aspirin monotherapy in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attacks. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DAPT in mild-to-moderate stroke. Aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether DAPT is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception till March 2024 for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate stroke. R version 4.3.2 was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: A total of 4 studies reporting data for 15,173 patients were included. DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of early neurological deterioration (END) (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.05, p = 0.07 Figure 1A) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.04, p = 0.07 Figure 1B) without reaching statistical significance. The risk of recurrent hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.86, p = 0.86 Figure 2A), all-cause death (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.08 Figure 2B), or myocardial infarction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.54 Figure 2C) was comparable across the two groups. DAPT was not associated with an increased risk of any bleeding event (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.36 Figure 2D). Conclusion: DAPT possibly reduces the risk of END and recurrent ischemic stroke as compared to aspirin monotherapy in mild or moderate stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding events.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.