Abstract 3742: Exposure burden for patients during an experimental study using a dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography

Abstract

Abstract Mammography provides early micro-calcification recognition, that is important for further breast cancer (BC) diagnosis. Imaging choice for BC detection is X-ray mammography (MG) with the use of high-resolution digital modality combined with iodinated contrast agents. However, a conventional MG has some sensitivity limitations, especially in patients with densely treated breasts. Moreover, MG contributes radiation risk for BC that is correlated with an exposure to ionizing radiation. Patients, for whom MG study does not give a clear interpretation are often further diagnosed by contrast-enhanced breast MRI, the most sensitive BC detection technique. Alternatively, it is limited by higher costs, lower availability and increased false positives. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a new method applied in BC that enables accurate detection of malignant breast lesions similar to breast MRI. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of CESM versus MG in BC detection. Additionally, doses given to the BC patients during imaging were compared. In this study, 250 consecutive women (144 MG vs. 105 CESM), that were screened using mammography between 2011 and 2014 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The comparison of entrance surface air kerma and mean glandular dose values for both options were recorded, respectively and analyzed using different statistical and retrospective approach. Results of presented study showed that CESM might be a new diagnostic tool allowing an accurate detection of BC lesions, giving results similar to those received from magnetic resonance imaging. A good agreement found between sensitivity of the method and tumour diameters measurements based on CESM, supports this tool as a potential replacement for breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of BC patients. However, a radiation burden for patients might be significantly higher than that for a standard full-field digital mammography procedure. In summary, each method has its own benefits with respect to specific applications that are further discussed in the study. Citation Format: Kamila Rawojc, Kamil Kisielewicz, Anna Dziecichowicz, Monika Tomaszuk, Anna Cepiga, Jankowska Anna, Cieśla Izabela, Najberg Dominika, Luczynska Elzbieta, Bartosz Kieltyka. Exposure burden for patients during an experimental study using a dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3742. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3742