Abstract

Abstract Background: Esophageal cancer is still a disease with a high degree of fatality despite resent advances in surgical techniques and various therapies. Several serum tumor markers have been applied to diagnose and to follow-up in patients with esophageal cancer in clinical practice in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of various serum tumor markers in patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Eighty one patients with esophageal cancer were recruited for this study. Serum level of tumor markers, squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC-Ag), p53 antibody(p53-Ab) carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), and CYFRA 21-1, were measured in subjects before treatment. The results of these tumor markers were compared with the clinicopathological findings of the subjects. Results: The positive rates of SCC-Ag, p53-Ab, CEA and CYFRA 21-1 were 44%, 34%, 17%, and 16% patients with esophageal cancer, respectively. SCC-Ag and p53-Ab showed positive with a relatively high frequency in cases of early stage esophageal cancer or superficial invasion, while CEA and CYFRA 21-1 could rarely be detected in such cases. Positive for SCC-Ag was significantly higher in patients with tumor invading into or through the musclaris propria than the patients within the submucosal layer. Substantially, the positive rate of SCC-Ag was associated with an advanced stage of disease. Values of p53-Ab in serum virtually demonstrated gradual decrease after treatment, not rapid depletion. All negative cases for p53-Ab before treatment showed negative at any point of treatment or follow-up on a consistent basis. CYFRA 21-1 showed positive in cases with distant metastasis. Conclusion: Each tumor marker for esophageal cancer presented different features in a clinicopathological analysis. The use of several combination of serum tumor markers seems to be most important for the detection and follow-up for of esophageal cancer at present. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3623. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3623

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call