Abstract

Abstract Background: Microdialysis (MD) is a method for continuously sampling small molecules in tissue extracellular fluid in vivo. To determine if free (non-protein bound) drug exposure (AUC) in plasma could be accurately measured by MD under non-steady state conditions, we compared intravenous MD to standard serial plasma sampling during and after a short infusion of etoposide. Methods: CMA IView 64 catheters (10 mm PAES membrane with 20 kD MWT cutoff) were surgically implanted into the external jugular vein of Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Catheter inflow and outflow tubing was tunneled subcutaneously from neck to the area on back between shoulder blades, brought through skin and attached to a MD pump (CMA 106 pump with fixed flow rate of 0.3 μL/min). The MD pump was secured in a fitted mesh jacket on the dorsum of the awake animal. Retrodialysis using 10 µM etoposide was used to measure in vivo relative recovery (RR) in each catheter. Following retrodialysis and catheter re-equilibration with normal saline, etoposide (5 mg/kg) was administered IV over 1 h. Serial plasma samples were collected during the infusion and for 8 h post-infusion. Free etoposide was extracted by ultrafiltration. MD samples were collected continuously over a single collection interval (0-9 h) or split into two collection intervals (0-3 h and 3-9 h). Etoposide was quantified using HPLC-electrochemical detection (linear range 0.05 - 10 μM). The etoposide concentration in MD samples was corrected for in vivo RR. The AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method for serial plasma sampling and by summation of the concentration x time intervals for MD. Results: Simultaneous MD and serial plasma sampling was performed in 5 animals. The in vivo RR of etoposide ranged from 86.9 - 99.4%. The mean AUC0-9h for plasma free etoposide was 3.27 (median 3.81, range 2.11 - 5.15) μM·h. The mean AUC0-9h for MD sampling was 2.68 (median 3.02, range 1.75 - 3.65) μM·h. The mean ratio of AUCMD:AUCplasma was 0.81. The mean (95% CI) for the difference in the paired MD and plasma AUC was − 0.7 (−1.94, 0.54) µM·h. Conclusions: Quantitative MD sampling for pharmacokinetic studies is feasible and the in vivo RR of etoposide is high. Free etoposide exposure by MD slightly underestimates the AUC compared to serial plasma sampling. Intravenous MD sampling may be a promising alternative to standard plasma sampling for calculating free etoposide exposure. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3596.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call