Abstract 339: Urban and Rural Patients Receive Different Care for Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for substantial resource utilization that is expected to increase as the US population ages. Management strategies for AF vary widely based on patient preference, physician specialty training, available resources, and other factors, but the impact that geography has on treatment variations for AF is unknown. Objective: We seek to evaluate differences in AF patient characteristics and management between urban and non-urban Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: Our cohort included all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries meeting the CMS chronic conditions warehouse definition of AF from 2013-2017. Beneficiaries were designated as urban and non-urban by rural-urban commuting area codes. AF procedures were tabulated based on CPT codes. The use of AF related medications was tabulated based on prescriptions for drugs of interest in Medicare Part D. Results: During our period of interest, Medicare AF patients were average age 79 yrs, and 52% were female. Urban patients were more likely to be black and have chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and ischemic heart disease. The average CHADS2VA2SC score was high (4.90 SD 1.71) and not meaningfully different between urban and non-urban groups. Most advanced interventions for AF increased over time driven mostly by increases in AF ablation (Figure). However, compared with non-urban patients, urban patients were more likely to undergo AF ablation (1.81 vs 1.42%, p<0.001), Watchman implantation (0.15 vs 0.11%, p<0.001), and cardioversion (0.06 vs 0.05%, p=0.015). Non-urban patients were more likely to be prescribed amiodarone (7.08 vs 6.09%, p=0.002) and warfarin (8.84 vs 7.40%, p<0.001) compared with urban patients and were less likely to be prescribed a direct oral anticoagulant. Conclusions: Despite urban and non-urban Medicare patients with AF being similar with regard to demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment of AF varied in important ways between these groups. In general, urban patients were more likely to receive interventional care for AF which, in some cases, has known associated benefits with regard to quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Further work is needed to understand differences in outcomes between these two groups and to develop policy solutions to reduce treatment disparities.