Abstract 3260: Differential effects of antiangiogenesis treatments on betel-nuts-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan

Abstract

Abstract Background: The treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(HNSCC) in Taiwan is very challenging and might be related to betel-nuts use. Betel-nuts chewing might contribute to (1)strong inflammation, invasion, and angiogenesis; (2)easy recurrence or metastasis; (3) poor response to chemotherapy, radiation, and epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) inhibitors. Purpose: We try to prove different kinds of anti-angiogenesis treatments will lead to different response on betel-nuts related HNSCC in Taiwan. Methods: Different anti-angiogenesis treatments, such as axitinib(VEGFR2 inhibitor), nintedanib(VEGFR2/FGFR inhibitor), and regorafenib(VEGFR2/FGFR/ more other signals inhibitor) were first used to treat (1)HUVEC; (2)HNSCC cell lines(SCC4, SCC9, SCC15, SCC25, FaDu, SAS, KB, Cal27, and TW2.6, betel-nuts related) to evaluate (a) invasion capacity by wound healing; (b) drug sensitivity by MTT assay; (c)synergistic effect with chemotherapy, EGFR inhibitor, and polo-like kinase inhibitor. Western blotting was also used to test signal change by treatments. TW2.6 had already been proved to possess defective p53, p16 loss, and increased Bcl2. Results: In our previous study, TW2.6 was resistant to chemotherapy, radiation, EGFR inhibitors, and ani-angiogenesis treamtents, such as axitinib and sunitinib. Axitinib, pure VEGFR2 inhibitor, was found to suppress HUVEC more prominently than nintedanib or regorafenib did. Invasion capacity of all HNSCC cell lines were all blocked by the three drugs but regorafenib did mostly well. However, axitinib had no effect on TW2.6; but nintedanb and regorafenib had moderate response on TW2.6. Besides, nintedanib and regorafenib both would resensitize TW2.6 to respond to chemotherapy, EGFR inhibitor, and polo-like kinase inhibitor again. Western blotting showed mesenchaml differentiation markers(slug, Twist, snail, Axl, c-MET, Vimentin) decreased after nintedanib and regorafenib use, too. Conclusion: TW2.6 might reflect treatment refractoriness of betel-nuts related HNSCC in Taiwan. In addition to PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition and polo-like kinase inhibitor with radiation(our studies shown in AACR and ESMO2015), VEGFR2/FGFR dual blockage might be effective on TW2,6 and resensitize TW2.6 to EGFR inhibitor, polo-like kinase inhibitor, & chemotherapy, maybe through the inhibition of mesenchymal transformation. VEGFR2/FGFR dual blockage will be one future combination backbone of betel-nuts related HNSCC. Citation Format: Jo-Pai Chen, Jui-Ying Chang, Sung-Hsin Kuo, Ruey-Long Hong. Differential effects of antiangiogenesis treatments on betel-nuts-related head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3260.