Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is an important tool for cardiovascular risk stratification. CAC scoring in both asymptomatic and symptomatic, low-intermediate risk patients has also shown prognostic utility and has a high negative predictive value for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients who present with chest pain frequently undergo non-gated chest computed tomography (CT) to evaluate for non-cardiac etiologies. In fact, several studies have demonstrated that a CAC score from a non-gated chest CT correlates well with a dedicated calcium-scoring CT. However, the predictive value on CAD through assessing the presence (CAC>0) or the absence of calcium (CAC=0) detected on non-gated chest CT in patients presenting with chest pain is unknown. Methods: Low-intermediate risk patients (n=92) presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who underwent non-gated chest CT and were subsequently evaluated with either a cardiac stress test or invasive coronary angiography were included. Dichotomous CAC was assessed in a blinded fashion and classified as CAC=0 or CAC>0. Obstructive CAD was defined as either: ischemia on stress testing or any coronary artery stenosis greater than 70% (left main coronary artery stenosis greater than 50%) on invasive coronary angiography. Results: CAC=0 on non-gated chest CT was found in 59.2% (n=42). Patients with CAC=0 had a significantly lower age and TIMI score compared to patients with a CAC>0. (p<0.01 ) Patients with a CAC>0 were found to more likely have obstructive CAD on subsequent testing: cardiac stress test (Likelihood ratio[LR]:6.42, p=0.022); and invasive angiography (LR:12.46, p=0.002). There were no patients with a CAC=0 that were found to have obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography, resulting in a 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. Conclusion: Patient who presents with chest pain frequently undergo evaluation with a non-gated chest CT to assess non-cardiac etiologies. Exclusion of CAC on non-gated chest CT may be useful as an adjunct for further risk stratification to avoid potential adverse events and cost associated with further testing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call