Abstract

Abstract EWS-ETS genetic fusion appears to be the initiating mechanism behind Ewing Family of Tumors (EFT) pathogenesis; however, progression of the disease is dependent on additional genetic alterations. Using the Progenetix database, we identified mainly alterations at 1q, and at 16q, as the most recurrent genetic alterations in EFT without consistency as markers of relapse. Clinic features of a large genotype cohort of 135 patients with EFT were retrospectively reviewed from A.C. Camargo hospital records. Tissue microarrays (TMA) were built for multi-color interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (iFISH) analysis of aberrations at 1q32.1 (KIF14/MDM4/PIK3C2ß) and 16q21 (CDH11) using in-house probes. Gains were defined by the presence of more than three hybridization signals per interphase nucleus with simultaneous intact centrosome signal occurring in more than 5% of tumor nuclei. Losses were indicated by one target signal with the intact centrosome signals in more than 30% of nuclei. The frequencies of gene copy number alterations (CNA) were compared with clinical parameters and follow-ups. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS program. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. CNA analysis showed gains at 1q32.1 in 15/128 (11.7%) cases, while abnormalities at 16q21 were seen in 24/118 (20.3%) patients, split into two groups. One group of patients, 11/118 (9.3%), showed only hemizygous deletion, whereas, the other group with 13/118 (11%) patients showed gain. A significant association between 1q32.1 gains and 16q21 losses (p=0.029) was detected, but not a significant clinical synergism when interacting at the same patient. Univariate analyses showed gains at 16q21 (p=0.029) or at 1q32.1 (p=0.005) associated with tumor relapse in the localized disease subgroup. Disease-free survival curves represented these gained regions as unfavorable outcome parameters (p<0.05) for EFT patients. The multivariate model confirmed 1q32.1 or 16q21 gains as independent prognostic markers for relapse. Hence, copy number gains at 1q32.1 and 16q21 constitute valuable markers of relapse in localized EFT. Genomic alterations of the critical genes in these chromosomal regions probably activate key downstream target genes of distinct pathways, which thus lead to an intricate molecular mechanism for EFT growth and aggressiveness. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 317. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-317

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.