Abstract
Abstract Human acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the most common type of acute leukemia, has approximately eight subtypes, many of which have poor prognosis. Most of these subtypes are associated with specific, recurrent chromosome translocations. These translocations result in fusion genes, which encode oncoproteins that block differentiation and promote proliferation of immature cells. The Myeloid Lymphoid Leukemia gene (MLL) is frequently involved in these translocations, and is considered a driver of the AML. Differentiation promoting drugs, such as all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) are an attractive alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but few types of AML, other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), respond to ATRA. We hypothesize that specific genes must be activated or inhibited in AML for drugs like ATRA to induce differentiation, and that gene activation or inhibition may be the result of specific epigenetic modification. We also hypothesize that AML with different genetic alterations may respond differently to specific epigenetic inhibitors. Our initial studies have focused on two MLL-driven AML cell lines, MV4;11 and THP-1, showing translocations t(4;11) and t(9;11), respectively, and one non-MLL related AML cell line, U937. MV4;11, THP-1, and U937 were treated with specific epigenetic modifiers, including tranylcypromine (TCP), an inhibitor of histone demethylase KMD1A/LSD1, N-acetyl-dinaline (CI-994), a general histone deacetylase inhibitor, and 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep), a S-adenosylhomocystein hydrolase inhibitor that depletes EZH2 and thus its associated H3K27me3 activity. Evidence for differentiation was noted in a variety of assays, including reduced cell proliferation as measured directly and by MTT assay, upregulation of myeloid-specific cell surface markers such as CD11b as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), myeloid-related nuclear morphological changes noted with cytospin analysis of cells, and decreased AML-associated gene expression with qPCR. All three drugs seemed to sensitize U937 and THP-1 cells to differentiate when treated with ATRA. MV4;11 cells were sensitized to differentiate by CI-994 and DZNep with or without ATRA, although there was no indication of CD11b upregulation. However, MV4;11 was not sensitized by TCP to differentiate with or without ATRA. These experiments suggest epigenetic inhibitors may increase sensitivity to ATRA differentiation therapy, but since the two MLL cell lines responded differently the response may still be dependent on the specific MLL partner gene driving the AML. Citation Format: Kalsi Heimdal, Bikalpa Ghimire, Edjay Ralph Hernandez, Heidi J. Gill Super. Epigenetic manipulation can sensitize AML cells to differentiate with ATRA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3064.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.