Abstract 287: Simulating the Effects of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Responders Embedded in a Marathon Cohort

Abstract

Introduction: Risk of sudden cardiac arrest may increase during distance running. In marathons, this risk is typically mitigated by deployment of medical resources, e.g. automated external defibrillators (AED), at fixed locations, potentially leaving racers vulnerable for periods of the race. We investigated utilization of marathon runners themselves as mobile emergency resources (R-AEDs). We hypothesized that systematic R-AED deployment would increase AED coverage of a race cohort over baseline coverage from static public AEDs. Methods: A simulation was constructed in MATLAB (vR2018a) incorporating the route of the 2018 Pittsburgh Marathon, detailed publicly available runner performance data from a nearby local marathon (N=1536), and known locations of S-AEDs with 1/8 th mile of any part of the Pittsburgh Marathon course (N = 47). During each simulation run, participants were randomly selected based on several distribution schemes (including age, pace category and pure chance) to carry an R-AED. R-AED coverage was assessed per minute by determining the proportion of racers up to 3 minutes ahead of each R-AED. S-AED coverage was calculated similarly based on whether runners were within 3-minutes of a public AED. All simulation variants were repeated 100 times and aggregated. Results: At baseline, 44% of the Pittsburgh Marathon course was within 3-minute walking distance of a public AED. Full coverage could be achieved with an additional 54 S-AEDs. Of the schemes we tested, when R-AEDs were deployed to random participants, optimal overall coverage was achieved with 1 R-AED per 25 runners (61 total for 57%), with 10% of race time achieving over 95% coverage. Weighted distribution of R-AEDs within age categories or pace categories achieved 72% coverage (155 AEDs) and 71% coverage, and over 95% coverage for 33% and 32% of the race duration, respectively. Conclusion: R-AEDs provided varying levels of additional coverage over baseline public access AED coverage during a simulated marathon. More work is necessary to fully determine the practical utility of this approach.