Abstract 2636: Targeted therapies to ERBB receptors downregulate expression of PD-L1: implications in combination therapies

Abstract

Abstract Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive and lethal form of primary breast cancer. Inflammatory signaling pathways are active in IBC, but the function of the immune response remains elusive. ErbB receptors play a role in IBC. ERBB2 is amplified in 50% of IBCs, and ERBB3 is also mutated in IBC. Currently, Lapatinib, a dual ErbB inhibitor, is used in IBC patients with ERBB2 amplification. Although immune cell inflammatory signaling may promote IBC tumor growth and metastasis, the presence of cytotoxic tumor-associated lymphocytes has also been associated with a more favorable breast cancer prognosis. The contradictory nature of the immune data highlights the need to elucidate the relationship between the immune response and subsequent treatments. Given the active IBC immune component and the recent clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment, IBC’s may represent a clinically unique breast cancer population that may benefit from immunomodulating agents. Interestingly, Myc is a downstream effector of ErbB signaling, and Myc is thought to regulate the expression of immune checkpoint proteins CD47 and PD-L1. The presence of PD-L1-positive IBC immune infiltrate suggests that IBC’s may benefit from therapies that disrupt PD-L1 signaling together with ErbB inhibitors. METHODS: IHC was used to examine immune checkpoint signaling and characterize the tumor-immune infiltrate. Tumor tissues were also characterized using an RNA-seq panel that examined the expression of 377 immune-related genes. Cell lines (BT474, SKR3, AU565, and SUM225) were treated with Lapatinib and Neratinib to examine the relationship between growth factor receptors and downstream immune signaling pathways. RESULTS: RNA-seq revealed the expression of specific immunosuppressive signaling pathways in tumors. Treatment of breast cancer cells with ErbB inhibitors resulted in a decrease in the levels of PD-L1. Treatment with Lapatinib and Neratinib diminished PD-L1 in all cell lines. Levels of Phospho-Stat3 decreased in BT474 and Sum225 but not in SKBR3 and AU565, implying that PD-L1 is regulated by another mechanism (ERK-MYC). CONCLUSION: Our results provide mechanistic insight into ErbB receptor activation and the expression of downstream signaling molecules (Stat3, Myc, PD-L1, and others). In addition, our unique RNA-seq immune signature reveals the expression of several genes that may serve as biomarkers of inhibitory immune signaling pathways. Our laboratory is currently examining the correlation between PD-L1 expression and the activation of ErbB2 in model systems and clinical trials using ErbB inhibitors in combination with PD-L1 inhibitors. Our immune panel gene signature may serve as a useful diagnostic test that, in conjunction with traditional ErbB testing, can identify patients that will benefit from combination therapy of an ErbB inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Christopher A. Hamm, Sumin Zhao, Cesar A. Santa-Maria, Massimo Cristofanilli, Neil L. Spector, Sarah Bacus. Targeted therapies to ERBB receptors downregulate expression of PD-L1: implications in combination therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2636. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2636