Abstract 2593: Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes

Abstract

Abstract Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a risk factor for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative invasive breast cancer (BC). Gene expression profiling has identified molecular signatures that classify invasive BC into distinct subtypes that vary in their clinical behavior, response to treatment and likely, etiology. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of tumor sections using antibody panels can be used to classify these ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. We evaluated whether density measures [PMD, absolute dense area (DA) and non-dense area (NDA)], are associated equally with all ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. Pooled analysis of six cohort or case-control studies included 3492 women with invasive BC and 10,148 without, who underwent screening mammography a median 4 years prior to diagnosis (for cases). PMD, DA, and NDA were assessed from digitized film-screen mammograms using a computer-assisted thresholding technique, and categorized as 0-10%, 11-25%, 26-50% and 51%+ (PMD) or into quartiles (DA and NDA). Receptor status was abstracted from pathology records and supplemented by IHC staining. We classified tumors as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2- and grade 1 or 2), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+ and HER2+ or Luminal A and grade 3), HER2 expressing (HER2+/ER-/PR-) and triple negative (TN) (ER-/PR-/HER2-). For TN, we also differentiated basal-like tumors (positive for EGFR and/or CK 5/6) from unclassified (negative on both markers). We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of each ‘intrinsic’ subtype of BC by categories of PMD, DA or NDA, adjusting for age, body mass index and study. We tested for statistical heterogeneity of associations by subtype. Of 3492 invasive BC cases, 2217 (63%) were classified as Luminal A, 747 (21%) as Luminal B, 159 (5%) as HER2 expressing, and 369 (11%) as TN. Of TN, 203 were evaluated for CK 5/6 and EGFR, with 167 (82%) classified as basal-like and 36 (18%) unclassified. PMD was associated with BC risk across all subtypes. For Luminal A, compared to women with 11-25% PMD (reference), women with 0-10% had a reduced risk of BC (OR = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.55, 0.74]) while women with 26-50% had an OR = 1.5 [1.3, 1.7] and women with 51%+ had the highest risk, OR = 2.3 [2.0, 2.7]. Similar BC associations were seen across PMD categories when comparing the five subtypes (P-heterogeneity = 0.63). Similar trends were seen for DA and BC across the five subtypes (P-het = 0.25). NDA was inversely associated with BC across subtypes, and there was suggestion of a stronger inverse trend among HER2-expressing BC compared to other subtypes (P-het = 0.09). Our results suggest mammographic density measures are associated with all ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. However, NDA may be more strongly inversely associated with HER2-expressing than other subtypes. Understanding the importance of density measures for BC subtypes has significance for subtype-specific risk models. Citation Format: Aaron D. Norman, Rulla M. Tamimi, Christopher G. Scott, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Matthew R. Jensen, Daniel W. Visscher, Fergus J. Couch, John Shepherd, Bo Fan, Yunn-Yi Chen, Lin Ma, Andrew Beck, Vernon S. Pankratz, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine M. Vachon. Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer ‘intrinsic’ molecular subtypes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2593.