Abstract

Background: Recommendations for “standardized” communication during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) events to reduce interruptions in chest compressions (CCs) are lacking. We aimed to achieve consensus on standardized communication during in-hospital CPR, evaluate feasibility and potential to decrease CC pauses, mental task load, and frustration. Methods: Modified Delphi consensus surveys of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation taskforce members to identify preferred communication for in-hospital cardiac arrest teams. Consensus was reached after-survey teleconference resolution by a team of interdisciplinary experts in communication and CPR. Feasibility was tested in 8 simulated CPR scenarios with physician team leaders randomized (1:1) to ‘standardized’ communication vs. “usual best practice”, closed loop communication. Team leaders watched a 3-min video and received a 10-min training on the assigned intervention before the CPR scenario. NASA task load index questionnaires were used to assess mental task load and frustration (0=lowest to 100=highest). Results: Modified Delphi consensus on standardized communication included: 1) preparing the team 15-30 seconds before interrupting CCs, 2) countdown for interruption synchronized with 5 CCs, 3) action words for stopping and resuming CCs, 4) action words for intubation and defibrillation. Among 8 CPR teams (4 standardized, 4 usual communication), median (Q1; Q3) CC interruption duration for rhythm check was significantly shorter, 5.3 (4.8; 6.8) vs. 9.4 (6.4; 13.0) sec for standardized vs. closed loop communication [p=0.02]. Median (Q1; Q3) scores of mental task load were 63 (33; 70) vs 85 (70; 96), [p=0.10] and frustration 10 (5; 34) vs 40 (26; 50) [p=0.11] for standardized vs. closed loop communication. Trained team leaders adhered to standardized phrases 77% of the time. Conclusion: Expert consensus for standardized communication during in-hospital CPR was achieved. Pilot simulation implementation of standardized communication demonstrated feasibility of team leader adherence, significantly decreased duration of CC interruption during rhythm checks, and a tendency to reduce team leader task load and frustration.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call