Abstract

Introduction: Anticoagulation with coumadin is often employed after anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by left ventricular (LV) dysfunction to prevent LV thrombus and cardioembolic events. However, the combination of dual antiplatelet therapy used for coronary stents and coumadin has been repeatedly shown to have a high incidence of bleeding. The current guidelines give coumadin a class II recommendation and support an individualized approach to treatment. Hypothesis: Determining the incidence and predictors of LV thrombus in a contemporary STEMI population at high risk for LV thrombus may assist in clinical decision making. Methods: Anterior STEMI patients at our institution between 2006 and 2013 treated with primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) that had an echocardiogram performed within 1 week and an ejection fraction of less than 40% or less than 50% with anterior apical akinesis were retrospectively identified. 687 patients with anterior STEMI were screened and 310 met inclusion. Demographic, clinical, and angiographic data was extracted from the medical record. Patients were categorized in 2 groups according to echocardiographic findings (no LV thrombus or probable/definite LV thrombus). The groups were compared by chi squared or T-test where appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: The mean age of the study population was 61.8% and 71.5% were male. The incidence of LV thrombus was 15% (n=263 no thrombus; n=47 probable/definite thrombus). Patients with LV thrombus were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, and more likely to have post procedure TIMI 0-1 flow and no stent use compared to patient with no LV thrombus. After adjustment, variables associated with LV thrombus risk were cardiac arrest (OR 4.06, 1.3-12.7), unfractionated heparin post PCI (2.43, 1.16-5.1), and stent use (DES 0.22, .06-.77, BMS 0.23 .07-.75, compared to balloon angioplasty). Conclusions: The incidence of LV thrombus in at risk STEMI patients remains high in contemporary practice. Development of a clinical risk score is limited by the lack of a sufficient number of predictive variables. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy in these patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call