Abstract

Background: There are limited data regarding cardioversion and atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients receiving novel, oral anti-Xa inhibitors. Methods: We compared the incidence of electrical cardioversion (ECV), pharmacologic cardioversion (PCV), or AF ablation and subsequent outcomes in the ROCKET AF trial. Results: Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 143 patients underwent ECV, 142 underwent PCV, and 79 underwent catheter ablation. The rate of ECV, PCV, or AF ablation was 1.44 per 100 patient-years in the warfarin arm and 1.46 per 100 patient-years in the rivaroxaban arm. In the adjusted analysis, the incidences of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.46-2.33), cardiovascular death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.55-2.78), and all-cause death (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.74-2.77) were not significantly different following ECV, PCV, or AF ablation. Hospitalization was increased following ECV, PCV, or AF ablation (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.63-2.86), and there was no evidence of a differential effect by randomized treatment (p for interaction=0.90). Event counts were similar in the rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients following ECV, PCV, or AF ablation, including stroke or systemic embolism or death from any cause (Figure). Conclusions: Despite an increase in hospitalization, there was no difference in long-term stroke rates or survival following cardioversion or AF ablation. Outcomes following cardioversion or ablation were similar in those treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call