Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is potentially associated with significant complications including stroke and cardiac decompensation. Early appropriate AF management mitigates this risk. However, intervention is frequently delayed - a median of 1.5 days from AF onset in the ICU to clinical response. We sought to better understand delays in detection and management of AF in patients admitted to a cardiology bed and the consequences of delays. Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of 498 patients admitted to cardiology beds at the University of Virginia Medical Center who had automated algorithmic detection of AF episodes lasting ≥6 min. Time from algorithmic detection to clinical identification, AF burden, AF interventions and complications, medical history, and demographics were identified in each patient’s chart. Results: Of the 498 patients, 171 had an algorithmically detected episode of AF that was not acknowledged medically. These undetected episodes were generally shorter relative to episodes that were acknowledged (median 8 min vs. 52 min). 96 of the 498 patients had initial clinical detection of AF following algorithm detection; of the 96, 21 received early intervention (within 60 min), 51 received late intervention (after 60 min), and 24 received no intervention at all. Patients with early intervention experienced less AF burden compared to late and no intervention groups (median 8.6 hrs vs 21.75 hrs vs 29.35 hrs). Late intervention patients had more AF related complications compared to early intervention patients (9.8% vs. 4.8%). 20.8% of patients with clinical acknowledgement of AF but no intervention suffered a complication. Patients with a history of AF were more likely to have delays in intervention and over twice as likely to suffer an AF complication compared to those with no history (15.6% vs. 7.4%). Patients of lower socioeconomic status (SES) were also more likely to experience a complication. Conclusions: In summary, cardiology inpatients at our hospital commonly experience delays in management of AF that are considerable in duration, resulting in greater AF burden and higher complication rates. Differences in management, and subsequent outcomes, following AF appear to be impacted by prior history of AF and patient SES.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call