Abstract 17654: Sarpogrelate versus Clopidogrel for Arterial Interventions Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Abstract

Background: Sarpogrelate has been used to alleviate ischemic changes by preventing thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and vascular smoothmuscle proliferation. The worldwide use of Sarpogrelate is arguable due to the lack of reliable data regarding its efficacy and safety.Accordingly, our meta-analysis aims to compare the complications after receiving Sarpogrelate with Aspirin (S&A) vs. Clopidogrel withAspirin (C&A) as part of dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with endovascular intervention. Methods: Multiple electronic databases weresearched to identify relevant articles, including MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Allclinical studies that investigated the complication after performing Sarpogrelate versus clopidogrel with Aspirin for arterial interventionswere included in the meta-analysis. Reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, and animal studies were all excluded. Data wereanalyzed by using comprehensive meta-analysis studies. A complete quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias toolversion 2 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Results: A total of 2588 studies were screened, with three studies included. Two multicenterRCTs and one retrospective cohort study including 527 patients (251 S&A and 276 C&A) were included. The overall quality was high in 2studies and fair in one. No statistically significant difference in restenosis, mortality, and bleeding risk as follows, respectively: (RR:0.81, 95%CI:0.52-1.2, P-value:0.36), (RR:0.37, 95% CI:0.06-2, P-value:0.25) and (RR:0.4, 95% CI:0.13-1.19, P-value:0.1). Conclusion: The antithromboticeffects of Aspirin with Sarpogrelate after vascular intervention are comparable to those of Aspirin plus Clopidogrel. Further large clinicalstudies are required to identify the actual difference in early and late complications after using Sarpogrelate versus clopidogrel.