Abstract

Introduction: Cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen (CBCR) is known for increasing risk of venous thromboembolic (TE) disease. We report a unique case of STEMI associated with CBCR which we believe was caused by coronary artery thrombosis. Case description: A 31-yo man with a past history of germ cell tumor presented with chest pain radiating to back and left arm. It started this morning and intensity did not worsen with exertion. He denied any dyspnea, diaphoresis or palpitations. He was non-smoker and non-obese. He denied any family history of premature coronary artery disease. He had undergone unilateral orchiectomy a year ago, and was currently receiving chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin; the last dose of his 3 rd cycle was given the day before. EKG showed ST elevation in leads I, aVL, V4 and V5. Troponin I was high to 6.9 ng/ml (ULN 0.045 ng/ml). He received intravenous infusion of thrombolytic. An angiogram done the next day showed moderate mid-LAD disease with residual clot. A CT scan and an echocardiogram later showed left ventricular thrombus (LVT). He was kept on therapeutic enoxaparin along with aspirin. Follow up echocardiogram showed resolution of the thrombus. His chemotherapy was stopped, and he has been kept on active surveillance since then. Discussion: Most cases of CBCR-associated myocardial infarction that have been reported have been seen in the older population with other risk factors for coronary artery disease. Cases where angiographic data was available, coronary artery vasospasm appeared to be the culprit rather than a true plaque rupture. While the presence of LVT raises possibility of thromboembolism to coronaries causing MI, the angiographic findings support accelerated plaque formation to be the cause of infarction. In earlier reports, elevated pre-treatment level of von Willebrand factor has been postulated to have some role in the disease pathogenesis. Other possible mechanisms for pathogenesis include endothelial cell damage, platelet activation, and imbalance between thromboxane-prostacyclin levels. This case emphasizes the need to keep cardiac etiologies of chest pain in the differential when evaluating patients on CBCR as timely intervention is life saving and prevent morbidity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.